<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APFO, Moratorium, Impact Fee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2007/07/24/apfo-moratorium-impact-fee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2007/07/24/apfo-moratorium-impact-fee/</link>
	<description>Affecting NC public policy through informed, energetic and progressive conversations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark D (The Scribe)</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2007/07/24/apfo-moratorium-impact-fee/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark D (The Scribe)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=508#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>In Union County, the APFO finally approved last fall is in under attack in the courts by developer/homebuilder pacs, by a new County Commissioner majority who took LARGE campaign donations from the homebuilder/Realtor/developer interests and now the NC Legislature with Senate Bill 1180: No Monetary Exaction for Development.

Here is a link: http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2007/Bills/Senate/HTML/S1180v1.html

Support for the &#039;developer special interests&#039; in North Carolina is not a partisan issue as it seems that green ($) attracts more support than blue or red.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Union County, the APFO finally approved last fall is in under attack in the courts by developer/homebuilder pacs, by a new County Commissioner majority who took LARGE campaign donations from the homebuilder/Realtor/developer interests and now the NC Legislature with Senate Bill 1180: No Monetary Exaction for Development.</p>
<p>Here is a link: <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2007/Bills/Senate/HTML/S1180v1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2007/Bills/Senate/HTML/S1180v1.html</a></p>
<p>Support for the &#8216;developer special interests&#8217; in North Carolina is not a partisan issue as it seems that green ($) attracts more support than blue or red.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

