Home > Uncategorized > We Are Hopelessly Racist

We Are Hopelessly Racist

Post on January 11, 2008 by 9 Comments »

I wish that statement were not true, but I fear that it is.

I have found that medical studies often provide a window into the soul of our nation.  Most recently, I was discouraged to read a report from a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.  Once again it was confirmed that there is significant disparity in the medical treatment of whites and non-whites.  This particular study found that black and Hispanic patients were 25% less likely to receive narcotic medications for severe pain in emergency rooms.

The analysis of more than 150,000 emergency room visits over 13 years found differences in prescribing by race in both urban and rural hospitals, in all U.S. regions and for every type of pain.The gaps between whites and nonwhites have not appeared to close at all," said study co-author Dr. Mark Pletcher of the University of California, San Francisco.

Ouch.  If ever there were a group which should be able to remain impartial and minimize bigotry it should be physicians.  Doctors are trained to revere objectivity and evidence.  Yet, despite conditions (human suffering) where empathy should be maximal, doctors could not shed their bias.  Sad.   Mind you, these disparities have been described for all types of treatment including pain control, cardiac catheterizations for chest pain, lung resection for lung cancer, etc.   Humans are simply predisposed to racism.

I doubt that the "playing field" can ever be truly level.  But for every college admission or job opportunity where a white applicant feels they've been screwed by affirmative action policies…I believe there are a hundred lost opportunities for non-whites, lost in a hundred different ways, by the type of soft-bigotry outlined in this medical study.  

Which brings us to Barack Obama.  I have no idea if the discrepancies between New Hampshire polls and election results are race-based.  Certainly it is a possibility pollsters, if not voters, ought to consider.  From a policy standpoint, it is difficult to care very much about the minor differences between Edwards, Clinton, and Obama.

There are many different reasons why voters choose a particular candidate.  But from the standpoint of race, an Obama presidency could be truly special.  It might send a message to the world, if not ourselves, that America is not hopeless regarding our original sin.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments (Closed):9

  1. Thierry Wernaers
    January 11, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    “But from the standpoint of race, an Obama presidency could be truly special. It might send a message to the world, if not ourselves, that America is not hopeless regarding our original sin.”

    Amen to that. Obama is already breaking through race barriers, it’s time to bust them wide open.

  2. DEFuning
    January 11, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    This is inaccurate reporting–you should have entitled this “Speculation About Something I Know Nothing About”. I do not mean offense here but it is dangerous to make these kind of statements and then fail to support them.

    The critical sentence in this article you linked to is this:
    “Doctors in accredited hospitals must ask patients about pain,…”
    I am a clinical social worker and have worked in hospital management ,Quality Assurance, Utilization Management as well as being a practitioner delivering care myself. The first thing that comes to mind for me in reading this study is that there is a tremendous disparity in THE SELF REPORTED LEVELS OF PAIN by race and culture. And that is not breaking news. Any decent entry level nursing, social work or other medical course will cover that in the first semester.

    When a doc or RN assesses for pain management, they ask the patient for a self assessment of the pain, usually on a numerical scale. My personal experience in delivering care, and in reviewing many thousands of charts is that this is very culturally dependent. African Americans–especially males, are less likely to report high levels of pain than are white males, and who report pain less than white females. In some cultures,like with Hispanic males for instance, they are considered weinies if they report any pain at all. This study does not report that it controlled for any of these factors. Yes, the gross numbers will support that there is different narcotic pain management by race and culture. You make a mistake when you attribute that to racism. Cultural differences in self-reported pain are a massive confounding variable.

    In short, if the patient reports little pain, that is what is charted, and that is what the administration of meds is based on. To attribute this to RACISM is inaccurate and irresponsible.

  3. sturner
    January 11, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    DEFuning…no offense taken, but I also have clinical experience (I have been a primary care physician for 20 years.) And, unfortunately for all of us in this case, I do know what I’m talking about. (However, don’t take my word for it…Google: racial disparity medical treatment.)

    There are racial disparities in virtually all aspects of medical care, not just pain control. Cancer treatment (breast, lung, colorectal), cardiac catheterizations, and transplant surgeries…to name just three. Most of these studies have been corrected for socioeconomic factors, so that what we are seeing is true racial disparity.

    That racism is involved is undeniable. Most likely we are talking about institutional racism, rather than an individual healthcare worker’s personal bias. That makes it all the harder to correct, and why an Obama presidency could be transforming.

    Worse yet, the racial disparities have been identified for twenty years. Recent documentation shows that little or no improvement is being made.

  4. DEFuning
    January 11, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    What are the racial disparities? In presenting for treatment? Or are patients denied treatment? Is it in the diagnostic process? The socioeconomic factors are not as salient in my experience of pain management assessment, documentation, treatment etc. as are the cultural factors. I would not deny that there are racists in every shape and color and profession. This article asserts that it is practitioner racism at fault and not institutional racism.

    One could make the same argument about the disparities by gender regarding pain control and most certainly in medical research itself. Many docs won’t even think about prescribing narcotics to a woman who is very verbal or assertive about the pain level for they interpret that as “drug seeking” behavior and so become suspicious. So should we also start the hue and cry of SEXISM and link it to the wonders of a Hillary presidency? There are also disparities by age. Should Fred Thompson get the ballyhoo?

    While I am not dismissing the relevancies of this article, I am getting very tired of the microscopic search for proof of racism in every utterance, look, gesture, ADL etc in the service of furthering someone’s political career or agenda in the current political discourse. It is getting ridiculous. As guerrilla theatre, the ginning up of the racist talk is brilliant. But it is bad science and even worse politics for it will eventually alienate allies in its overkill. The Democratic party can easily shatter over this and then we will have a President McCain. Be careful about overplaying that “racism” hand.

    The study is very interesting, I wish it had more of its methodology available to really look at the sample and its controls.

  5. sturner
    January 11, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    The point of this post was to highlight this study in order to emphasize that racism is embedded in the American DNA. I believe that racism is still the original sin of America, and accounts for much of our pathologies today.

    It seems to me that a figure like Obama could do much to heal the nation. Like Martin Luther King, true agents of change may only come along once a generation. If Obama is that person, it ought to be one of the factors voters consider when choosing their candidate. It was not intended to be an endorsement of Obama or his political agenda. I like Hillary, too, but I doubt a second Clinton presidency would do very much to heal the nation.

    While I understand your specific concerns with this study and pain-control, I also think you marginalize the overall racial disparities in medical treatment. It has been well documented for many years, across every medical specialty, for myriad illnesses. This is no “microscopic search for proof of racism”…this is clear evidence of inbred and systemic racism.

  6. DEFuning
    January 12, 2008 at 8:48 am

    I am not marginalizing racial disparities, I am however pointing up confounding factors in this study and asking pointed questions about which point in the service provision process accounts for the failure of equal treatment. No answers are forthcoming.

    I am suspect of the charges of the title of this article that “We Are Hopelessly Racist” because I see it as being guilty of tremendous bias and of fixing the facts around a preconceived notion to support a political agenda. Let’s talk about healthcare–not Obama. There are many disparities in the provision of healthcare but ya’ll only seem to be interested in race. There is no evidence that this study adjusted for confounding cultural factors in the self reporting mechanism of pain assessment which is the Occam’s Razor here. Controlling for socioeconomic status alone does not cut it. Unless that is accounted for, this study is crap for the observed disparity can be attributed to other causative factors.

    Lots of published research can be picked apart as crap that is published to support a political agenda and could be rightly renamed “propaganda”. Just look at some of the garbage studies published that blame the veterans for the development of PTSD due to a) their outright lying about it to game the system or b) pre-existing personality disorders that make them “think” they have it–all in the service of denying them disability benefits, rationing care, controlling costs and to control the fallout from the negative press generated by a generation of vets who are psychologically shattered so an unpopular war can be perpetuated. All published in medical journals and all crap that can be systematically picked apart in a review of the methodology– but that rarely gets done by mainstream media who lurch for the sexy headline and leave it at that.

    I have been horrified by the “racism” rhetoric I have been reading lately because it clearly demonstrates an affinity by some for searching the environment for any evidence of behavior that can be spun into offenses in the service of a political agenda. To say that some are quick to take offense is an understatement–to say that they are looking for a fight is more like it. This keeps the race card right in the fore and is nothing more than very effective guerrilla theater. There is nothing like a rumble to grab the attention of the masses. This is a political strategy and utilizes an “offense offensive” which is quite effective for keeping Hillary and Edwards on the ropes but does not indicate to me that Obama will do anything other than guarantee a President Huckabee or McCain. As long as the political discourse is largely about charges of racism, other substantive issues do not get addressed. It is a smoke screen. And just like this medical study, to point out that racial disparities exist does nothing to account for the WHY and HOW of their existence. And didn’t you say that we knew this already???

    To quote President Clinton:GIVE ME A BREAK!! The race card is being overplayed. To suggest that Obama can unite people by being some kind of Kumbaya healer is not empirically supported by his campaign which is, indeed, on a “microscopic search for proof of racism” and is so quick to take offense that it is alienating even long time allies and champions of racial equality.

  7. sturner
    January 13, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    DEFuning…OK, let’s forget about Obama or Clinton or Edwards for the time being, and get to the crux of the matter.

    Regarding well documented racial disparities in medical treatment, why are you trying so hard to deny that racism is a factor? Odds are it’s the most important factor. My understanding of “Occam’s Razor” is that “all other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.”

    The common thread, the “simplest solution”, among these studies is… race.

    Yet, you persisist in looking for “confounding factors,” “service provision process,” “cultural factors,” “socioeconomic factors,” “causative factors,”…everything but the “most likely factor”…racism.

    Here is a question you should ask yourself. If you are right, and all of these studies which document racial disparities in medical treatment are due to flaws in study methodology, then…

    Why does no study EVER show that non-whites have more favorable health outcomes than white patients? Wouldn’t you think…just once…that flaws in methodology would favor non-whites? If such a study exists I can’t find it.

    As you would say…”I do not mean offense here,” but is it possible that when well-meaning persons like yourself are eager to search for every possible explanation other than race…perhaps that in itself is evidence of institutional racism? I’m pretty sure Stokely Carmichael and ML King, Jr would think so.

    Institutional racism can be unintentional or intentional, overt or covert. Individuals themselves need not exhibit personal racial prejudices, yet their institutions may be discriminatory (such as the judicial system).

    Personally, I believe there is plenty of evidence for institutional bias in medical treatment. Despite recognition of a problem, it is discouraging that very little has been accomplished to correct it. At the very least we ought to be able to talk about it.

    It was not necessary for me to link Obama to this issue. I regret that it has been a distraction. Having said that, I would not be so quick to denigrate him as a “Kumbaya healer.” Can you identify an African-American politician in the last 20 years who has exhibited his skills engaging young voters and independents? If there is going to be progress made on race, it will be youth driven just like it happened in the 1960′s.

    As Progressives, it is better to address both racism and sexism sooner rather than later. You can be sure the Republicans plan to use it in the general election.

  8. DEFuning
    January 14, 2008 at 6:36 pm

    “Yet, you persisist in looking for “confounding factors,” “service provision process,” “cultural factors,” “socioeconomic factors,” “causative factors,”…everything but the “most likely factor”…racism.”
    You don’t get this –the simplest explanation here is that there are cultural differences in how each patient is predisposed to answer a question. You are in effect comparing elephants to oranges by suggesting that you will get as valid an answer to pain level experienced from Patient A as you would from Patient B, despite the fact that A and B are not likely to give an accurate and candid answer due to cultural prohibitions. But in your world view, it seems that there is only ONE EXPLANATION for this phenomenon and that is the unscientifically defined construct of “racism”. There was no measure of the variable “racism” defined in this study. But you assert that it is the only explanation.

    The very- difficult to operationally define variable of “racism” is not science– that is OPINION. You seem to misunderstand the very basics of Research Methods 101. In science you have to empirically prove that A CAUSES B. Not that A & B occur at the same time– which does not necessarily imply causation. Or in this case that B occurs (less pain meds by race) and A (racism) caused it. B could easily have been caused by C=That patient X gives his pain rating a “1″ because it is his cultural heritage to under-report pain for fear of looking like a wus, and patient Y gives the same subjective level of pain a “9″ because there is less shame in his culture for reporting pain most certainly would cause the same effect as seen in this study. And there is a tremendous body of research which provides empirical evidence of this very phenomenon. All variables are given operational definitions and it is clearly shown that cultural prohibitions on the self report of pain experienced will have a significant impact on the level of care provided. Occam’s Razor.

    My question that you so deride is “Where in the service provision process is this so-called “racism” intervening and resulting in the failure to provide adequate pain management to African Americans and Hispanics”? Is it at intake? Triage? Initial assessment and diagnosis by the tech? RN? Doc? Anesthesiologist? Where? and Who?

  9. sturner
    January 15, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Your points regarding this specific study on pain control are not invalid, but miss the larger issue in my mind.

    Take sexism in the workplace, which you might define as “a very-difficult to operationally define variable that is not science but opinion.” Would your approach be to assign operational definitions to the variables of the Authoritarian Father, the alcoholic husband, the prevailing dogma of the Church Elders, the ambitious district manager, the inexperienced Human Resources Director, or the thrice-divorced CEO responsible for the presiding corporate philosophy?

    Or would women be better served by framing the larger issue and demanding “equal opportunities, and equal pay for equal work,” perhaps inspired by a charismatic leader who herself has broken through the glass ceiling (like a president Hillary Clinton).

    Maybe we are both right, and these two approaches can complement one another:
    a) document disparities, and frame this within the larger issue of “social justice.” Meanwhile,…
    b) identify specific causative factors and correct them, if possible.

    Chris Fitzsimon has another perspective here:
    http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/cms/?p=11271