The Enigmatic Terminal Groin
Figure 8 Island, backed by the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA) and its N.C. member group with a slightly different name, is busy promoting a terminal groin on Figure 8 Island to save a dozen buildings. The marine science community of North Carolina strongly disagrees with the claims made to promote the structure because it will damage (increase erosion rates) adjacent beaches and will be the first retreat from North Carolina's laws that prohibit hard stabilization on our beaches. North Carolina’s “anti-seawall” law has put this state in better shape to respond to sea level rise than any other coastal state.
Promoters argue that the terminal groin will not create problems, which is not true. The very phrase “terminal groin” is a lie of Baron Munchausen proportions! It was a term first used incorrectly at Oregon Inlet to avoid the inflammatory word "jetty" after a long nationally- prominent societal battle over jetty construction. After 25 years' worth of evidence had accumulated indicating that building a jetty at Oregon Inlet wouldn’t work, the state said, “We're not building a jetty – we're building a terminal groin.” And just as predicted, the 3000-foot Oregon Inlet jetty has created immense and very costly erosion problems.
Everything about the Figure 8 terminal groin seems disingenuous, from its name, to the claims of how the structure will work, and even to the technical literature claimed to support the structure, which is basically non-existent. Perhaps the ASBPA should be called the American Shorefront Building Preservation Association and Pinocchio could be the organization’s mascot.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged environment, policy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments (Closed):34