Polar bears and oysters or health care for kids

 Senate Majority Leader Tony Rand says the state doesn't have enough money to pay for Health Choice until the end of the year. The program provides health care for kids in families with incomes up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

Congress and the White House have been battling over reauthorizing the program, giving state lawmakers an excuse to cut its state funding. The House budget includes $10.4 million for Health Choice. The Senate budget only has $1.7 million and caps the enrollment next year and would not allow any kids to sign up for coverage from September 1 to April.

(Actually, lawmakers ought to be funding Kids' Care, an program to cover children in families who earn up to 300 percent of poverty. Adam Searing makes that clear in a recent post here on the Pulse. )

It seems like a no-brainer to cover kids who are eliginle for care now under Health Choice and not wait for Washington. And the money is there, whatever Rand and other Senate leaders say.

There is $2.7 million in the Senate budget for renovation of the polar exhibit at the zoo and another $4.3 million for an oyster hatchery, not to mention that the Senate recently decided to give wealthy people another tax break by voting to repeal the state gift tax, which will reduce state revenue by $18 million.

That would pay for a lot of trips to the doctor for kids who currently don't have health care coverage. State budgets are really just a list of priorities and whether Senate leaders want to admit it or not, their list seems to indicate they think more of polar bears and oysters and helping rich people than keeping kids healthy.


  1. Max

    June 18, 2008 at 2:43 pm

  2. kathybull

    June 19, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Before you start listing projects whose funds could be better used for other critical needs, it might be wise to look at all the extra spending items before picking out those that can give you headline quips.
    The NC Zoo is a state facility that returns revenue to the state. It has been largely ignored over the last 15 years in state funding for its upkeep and capital facilities. Now that the facility is showing signs of wear and stands the chance of losing revenue, the state is willing to throw some money that is being matched by private donors, many of whom have been supporting the facility needs of the STATE zoo for the last 15 years. The funding for the Zoo is a matter of protecting the state’s investments and being good stewards of its assets.
    There are dollars that get sent to “pet projects” and other things that might be used to address children’s health, let’s look at some of those before we start attacking legislators for taking care of their own buildings and keeping them from becoming dangerous to visitors.

  3. […] it comes to one of their pet issues, the Pulse is happy to whine about pork and its opportunity costs (children’s Medicaid, for example). I’ve spent a lot of time […]

Check Also

Anthony Scaramucci thought HB2 was “shameful”

Anthony Scaramucci, President Trump’s new communications director, was ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

In 39 days, some children and teenagers under the age of 18 will no longer be charged in the adult c [...]

Common Cause released a report today that shows drawing electoral boundaries using only data for cit [...]

Recurring low-performing schools can get fresh starts under the state’s Restart school reform model, [...]

North Carolina Republicans are using procedural arguments to dismiss the relevance of the U.S. House [...]

In any discussion of North Carolina politics and policy debates, it’s hard to overstate the footprin [...]

The post The Spineless Dead-Horseman appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When the journalist Michael Kinsley wrote in 1984 that a gaffe “is when a politician tells the truth [...]

Tonight's Democratic presidential debate will be dominated by two urgent issues: the House of R [...]