Why the NC Senate’s amendment on child health insurance means nothing

This afternoon, as the NC Senate passed their version of the state budget, the provisions of the bill regarding freezing affordable child health insurance (Health Choice) were amended.  Offered by Senator Kay Hagan, the amendment didn't restore the $8 plus million dollar cut the NC Senate made in the House and Governor's plan for keeping the program open.  Not only was there no new money, but the amendment left in place the Senate's plan to close the program to new children starting September 1, 2008.

What did the amendment do?  It orders the state Health Choice program to start enrolling kids if Congress reauthorizes the program next year.  Without any new money for Health Choice to do this, this is essentially a meaningless bit of political fig leaf.  You can tell a state agency to do something, but without giving them any funding to do it (and I strongly doubt any state agency has millions of extra dollars lying around idle these days anyway) means it won't get done.

Finally, this amendment ignores the facts, as detailed in my post below.  Congress did reauthorize the program with plenty of funding through the end of March 2009.  NC is in no danger of running out of federal funds for Health Choice.  If Congress fails to act to reauthorize for a longer period as everyone expects early next year, the General Assembly will be in session then and can close the program at that point if that's what they really want to do.  It is simply pointless to close it now and moreover will hurt thousands of North Carolina families.


  1. […] Original post here […]

  2. […] the rest of this great post here […]

  3. […] Go to the author’s original blog: Why the NC Senate’s amendment on child health insurance means nothing […]

  4. Kim Morris

    June 19, 2008 at 8:51 am

    Recent national trend indicatie that these insurance programs for kids might have passed their point of peak effectivenes and are now in a point of showing diminishing returns on the additional funding. I wonder if North Carolina’s situation is any different. See “Trends in Children’s Health Insurance” at http://medsave.com/articles/trends-in-children's-health-insurance.htm
    and “Covering the Uninsured – 2008 Update” at http://medsave.com/articles/Covering-the-uninsured-2008-Update.htm for coverage if recent reports on CHIP.

  5. Adam Searing

    June 20, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    Kim –

    Yeah, right. And which insurance companies is “medsave” a shill for?

Check Also

Oklahoma voters approve constitutional amendment to expand Medicaid

[Cross-posted from the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute’s ...

Join Our Team

NC Policy Watch is hiring two new journalists to join our award-winning team. Click here for more information.  

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Although not the farmer, Sen. Tom McInnis of Richmond County owns the land A proposed poultry farm n [...]

The last four years have produced little in the way of affirmative policy accomplishments for the Tr [...]

As part of our ongoing effort to inform North Carolinians about the state judiciary, Policy Watch is [...]

Even with an increase in absentee voting, election directors expect a large in-person turnout. Since [...]

It’s been more than a quarter-century since Justice Clarence Thomas was confirmed to serve on the U. [...]

The post QAnon(sense) appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Talk from Republican senators about "rules" and "precedent" is nothing but a smo [...]

Supreme Court hypocrisy, effort to infiltrate progressive NC groups ought to be the last straws It s [...]