Comments on: Top 10 weird and/or hypocritical moments at yesterday’s “Take Back Our State” event http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2008/06/26/top-10-weird-andor-hypocritical-moments-at-yesterday%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctake-back-our-state%e2%80%9d-event/ Affecting NC public policy through informed, energetic and progressive conversations. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:17:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sam Wynn http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2008/06/26/top-10-weird-andor-hypocritical-moments-at-yesterday%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctake-back-our-state%e2%80%9d-event/#comment-14705 Sam Wynn Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:56:19 +0000 http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=1256#comment-14705 This is priceless. Thanks for putting it all into perspective for us. This is priceless. Thanks for putting it all into perspective for us.

]]> By: James http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2008/06/26/top-10-weird-andor-hypocritical-moments-at-yesterday%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctake-back-our-state%e2%80%9d-event/#comment-14677 James Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:27:31 +0000 http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=1256#comment-14677 Great post. Glad I missed all the nastiness. Great post.

Glad I missed all the nastiness.

]]> By: Rob Schofield http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2008/06/26/top-10-weird-andor-hypocritical-moments-at-yesterday%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctake-back-our-state%e2%80%9d-event/#comment-14323 Rob Schofield Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:38:47 +0000 http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=1256#comment-14323 Note -- The series of comments that have appeared on this post over the last day or so have gotten a little far afield and into the realm of personal attacks on other blog particpants rather than comments on issues or public figures. In keeping with the rules of this blog (see above at the right) we're gonna' clean the slate and delete any such comments in the future. If anyone wants to debate the substance of the post that will be fine. Otherwise, we'll just move on. For the record, we'll take the assurances of the group that was behind this event that it was their 501(c)(4) wing and not their (c)(3) branch that was the offical sponsor. We stand behind the substance of all of the other points made in the post. Note — The series of comments that have appeared on this post over the last day or so have gotten a little far afield and into the realm of personal attacks on other blog particpants rather than comments on issues or public figures. In keeping with the rules of this blog (see above at the right) we’re gonna’ clean the slate and delete any such comments in the future.

If anyone wants to debate the substance of the post that will be fine. Otherwise, we’ll just move on.

For the record, we’ll take the assurances of the group that was behind this event that it was their 501(c)(4) wing and not their (c)(3) branch that was the offical sponsor. We stand behind the substance of all of the other points made in the post.

]]>