Uncategorized

This is Your Pilot

Ten Questions to Better Pilot Programs is an obscure but interesting Fiscal Brief produced last month by the Fiscal Research Division of the North Carolina General Assembly.  Study bills and pilot programs are often used to molify sponsors of legislation otherwise faced with certain defeat.  When properly designed and implemented pilot programs can produce useful information.  Many such programs are inadvertently doomed to preclude meaningful assessment, producing ambiguous results.

The Fiscal Brief has some general recommendations:

Policymakers should insist upon pilot programs that are designed as randomly controlled trials whenever possible.
   :::::
Policymakers should avoid insisting that their district or districts be included in treatment groups.
   :::::
A pilot program that generates actionable data is far more important than having a poorly designed program placed in a home district.
   :::::
Policymakers should allow time for pilot programs to reach their full implementation and allow time to observe program effects. Acting too early might result in the abandonment of programs that are actually working.

Policymakers should ask the following ten questions to ensure that new pilot programs will be able to provide clear results:

1.  What is the problem that needs solving?
2.  How does the program address the identified problem?
3.  What is the cost of the program if it is successful?
4.  Is there a budget or spending plan?
5.  What criteria will be used to determine the program’s success or failure?
6.  What alternative programs/solutions might also address the problem?
7.  Does the design of the program allow for meaningful evaluation?
8.  Are there problems in the program design that will affect validity?
9.  Is there sufficient time to observe effects?
10. Are there enough units of study to ensure statistical significance?

Clear results will help legislators to avoid pifalls and to direct tax dollars to useful and effective purposes.  The Fiscal Research Division produces other wonkish reports of interest to anyone concerned about the state budget and the fiscal impact of proposed legislation.

One Comment


  1. James

    September 16, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    Fascinating. Thanks for posting this. I love experimentation … we do not nearly enough for my tastes.

Check Also

Frackuccino

If they won’t tell us what’s in fracking ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement refuses to disclose any details of probe into alle [...]

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

Here is something you probably haven’t heard much lately, if at all, given the shocking news from Ch [...]

Lawmakers to return to Raleigh yet again; agenda may include dangerous “de-reg” proposal The North C [...]

The three federal judges could have just come right out and said it: The Republicans who rule the N. [...]

3---number of states that adopted new state Earned Income Tax Credits in 2017---Montana, Hawaii, and [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more