Uncategorized

NO WAY!

Paul Krugman, who is quoted pretty liberally (tee hee) around these parts, has won the Nobel Prize for Economics. He was the sole winner of the prize normally shared by two or three economists, meaning that the Krug (as I like to call him [because I’m really imaginative]) gets to keep the cool $1.4 mil prize all to himself. He won for his dismal scientific merit, of course, not for his opinions, but I still hope more people avail themselves of his wisdom. After all, this proves he’s really, really smart! How smart is he? Not only did he get a PhD just three (3!) years after earning his Bachelor’s, but:

The Bush administration would not comment Monday on whether Krugman would be invited to the White House as is custom with American Nobel laureates.

You know you’re on the right track when the enemies of knowledge and wisdom – or, as he has put it, “the party of the stupid” – don’t want you to come to dinner. Right on, Paul. He didn’t win for that, though. Here’s what the committee had to say about his work:

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences praised Krugman for formulating a new theory to answer questions about free trade and said his theory had inspired an enormous field of research.

‘What are the effects of free trade and globalization? What are the driving forces behind worldwide urbanization? Paul Krugman has formulated a new theory to answer these questions,’ the academy said in its citation.

‘He has thereby integrated the previously disparate research fields of international trade and economic geography,’ it said.”

You can read more about it on his blog, The Conscience of a Liberal. All I can say is, Congratulations!

2 Comments


  1. Rob Schofield

    October 13, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    I nominate Krugman to replace Bernanke in 2010.

  2. IBXer

    October 15, 2008 at 8:59 am

    Dr. Don Boudreaux writes to the Wall Street Journal:

    “Like many colleagues who share my appreciation for markets and distrust of government, I’m disappointed with the award of the Nobel Prize to Paul Krugman (“Paul Krugman Wins Economics Nobel,” October 14). My disappointment stems not from objections I have to the work in trade theory for which Krugman won.

    Rather, my disappointment is that the Prize gives the most celebrated credential in economics to a man who routinely issues policy recommendations in apparent ignorance of bedrock truths of his discipline.

    One of these truths is that resources are not free. Yet on Sept. 14, 2001, Krugman wrote that the need to rebuild following the 9/11 attacks would generate “favorable effects”* for the economy; he forgot that resources used to rebuild would have been used to produce other goods and services that, because of the attacks, were not built. Another truth is the reality of mutual gains from trade: Yet on October 20, 2002, he wrote that if the rich get richer, the poor and middle-class must get poorer as “a matter of arithmetic.”

    A person who commits elementary errors such as these when discussing economics ought not be taken seriously. Yet Mr. Krugman’s Prize will add undeserved credence to his policy pronouncements.

    Sincerely,
    Donald J. Boudreaux
    Chairman, Department of Economics
    George Mason University”

Check Also

He’s back? A little friendly career advice for Pat McCrory

Dear Pat, Hey there, stranger! It’s been a ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

When Gov. Roy Cooper signed the Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention or STOP Act into law last month, [...]

Support for needy districts and key positions within North Carolina’s top public school agency may b [...]

Wilmington is bustling this summer. Downtown, horse-drawn carriages take tourists along the riverfro [...]

For the first time in a long time, trial judges in North Carolina have independent research assistan [...]

It’s not an original thought to point out that the Trump Administration is a larger version of what [...]

Why this is not “business as usual” and should not be condoned Sometimes all one can do is stand and [...]

5.0---percentage of overall state spending in the 2017-2018 budget passed by the General Assembly as [...]

The post A legislative addiction appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more