<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lobbying Lanier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/</link>
	<description>Affecting NC public policy through informed, energetic and progressive conversations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29816</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29816</guid>
		<description>http://bluenc.com/dear-bev-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bluenc.com/dear-bev-0" rel="nofollow">http://bluenc.com/dear-bev-0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29815</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29815</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a sad day when someone being &quot;not that bad&quot; is the best we can get in such a critical office.

I&#039;m disgusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sad day when someone being &#8220;not that bad&#8221; is the best we can get in such a critical office.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m disgusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HealthCare Now</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29814</link>
		<dc:creator>HealthCare Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29814</guid>
		<description>Interesting quote from Mr. Cansler (REPUBLICAN) from the May 2005 Socializedd Medicine Blog:

&quot;Lanier Cansler, a Republican who recently stepped down as the No. 2 official in the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, said, &quot;Everyone is beginning to understand that Medicaid isn&#039;t going to be sustained as it is.&quot; ...&quot;

http://socglory.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting quote from Mr. Cansler (REPUBLICAN) from the May 2005 Socializedd Medicine Blog:</p>
<p>&#8220;Lanier Cansler, a Republican who recently stepped down as the No. 2 official in the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, said, &#8220;Everyone is beginning to understand that Medicaid isn&#8217;t going to be sustained as it is.&#8221; &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://socglory.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html" rel="nofollow">http://socglory.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamL</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29813</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29813</guid>
		<description>Guess we have our man: http://www.newsobserver.com/front/story/1356561.html#Comments_Container</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess we have our man: <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/front/story/1356561.html#Comments_Container" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsobserver.com/front/story/1356561.html#Comments_Container</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doremus Jessup</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29809</link>
		<dc:creator>Doremus Jessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29809</guid>
		<description>what was that women&#039;s name that was  drug company lobbyist before sheran DHHS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what was that women&#8217;s name that was  drug company lobbyist before sheran DHHS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doremus Jessup</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29808</link>
		<dc:creator>Doremus Jessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29808</guid>
		<description>sorry, I dont believe lawyers are qualified to run a health agency. Better a person with some hands on experience like a doctor or a nurse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, I dont believe lawyers are qualified to run a health agency. Better a person with some hands on experience like a doctor or a nurse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Linker</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29807</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Linker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29807</guid>
		<description>Pam Silberman! Devlin would be good too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam Silberman! Devlin would be good too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: englewood</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29805</link>
		<dc:creator>englewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29805</guid>
		<description>I ask the question &quot;Whom do you suggest?&quot; not to put you on the spot but to get some ideas. I&#039;ve been racking my brain thinking of potential HHS Secs. of progressive bent and solid history in this area, and I&#039;m fresh out. Odd that the great mentioner hasn&#039;t mentioned many good names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ask the question &#8220;Whom do you suggest?&#8221; not to put you on the spot but to get some ideas. I&#8217;ve been racking my brain thinking of potential HHS Secs. of progressive bent and solid history in this area, and I&#8217;m fresh out. Odd that the great mentioner hasn&#8217;t mentioned many good names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doremus Jessup</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29803</link>
		<dc:creator>Doremus Jessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29803</guid>
		<description>Computer Sciences Corporation? Hmm..... isnt that the big National Security Agency contractor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computer Sciences Corporation? Hmm&#8230;.. isnt that the big National Security Agency contractor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Searing</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/01/06/lobbying-lanier/#comment-29801</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Searing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=2567#comment-29801</guid>
		<description>I actually don&#039;t think Cansler would be that bad as DHHS Sec - I just think this relationship raises some serious questions that need to be addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don&#8217;t think Cansler would be that bad as DHHS Sec &#8211; I just think this relationship raises some serious questions that need to be addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

