Home > Uncategorized > Mawwage Is What Bwings Us Together Today

Mawwage Is What Bwings Us Together Today

Post on March 4, 2009 by 2 Comments »

Ah, that blessed awwangement, the dweam within a dweam. Thanks to the N&O for covering this bigoted rally. It happened practically in my backyard, but I was busy – sitting in my car waiting for a tow truck – and missed it completely. I do like to know what enemies of liberty are up to, though, so I’m glad I could read all about it. I wonder why they think it’s okay to deny people their civil rights, but I bet it’s because approximately 75% are afflicted with the thorn of bigotry, while a quarter just don’t like change. Here’s the choicest part of the show:

David Gibbs III, a lawyer who in 2005 fought to keep brain-damaged Terri Schiavo on life support, told rally participants gay marriage would “open the door to unusual marriage in North Carolina.

‘Why not polygamy, or three or four spouses?’ Gibbs asked. ‘Maybe people will want to marry their pets or robots.’”

This guy supports rights for the brain-dead but not for gays and lesbians? That explains a lot! He isn’t much in the degeneracy department either. Marry a robot? ‘Blow-up doll’ works better there. And, how about “People will want to marry chickens, and they’ll be able to IN NORTH CAROLINA!” That’s a lot better and has a knowing reference to Larry Flynt, to boot. If you’re going to scare people, you ought to do it right.

The rally was sponsored by Return America and NC4Marriage. I can think of so, so many reasons anyone who is not a white, land-owning male would not want to return to colonial mores, while the use of the numeral 4 calls to mind The Artist Formerly Known as The Artist Formerly Known as Prince. That can’t be intentional. A group called WallBuilders was also represented. I love that name, it’s concise – we’re building walls to keep certain people out. Very clear.

The concluding juxtaposition was most telling.

Sen. Jim Jacumin, a Republican representing Burke and Caldwell counties and one of the co-sponsors of the bill, read most of Genesis 2, the biblical passage in which woman is created out of Adam’s rib to be his ‘helper.’

Kim Cooley of Raleigh said she felt so passionate about the issue she just had to come.

‘We need to tell our government,’ she said, ‘the basic structure of society needs a biblical framework.’”

You better watch out, Kimmy, they’ll be coming for you next. If marriage is between one man and one woman, and she’s just the (not even hired) help, then what does she need property for? Or the right to vote? Or the right tempt people with her form and her hair. She don’t need all that. Git her a passel a babies and a burqa, and she’ll be busy the way God intended her to be. Our civil rights have evolved as our understanding of human rights, of humanity, and as our society and technology have evolved. I celebrate the changes that have come and those still to come. I especially look forward to the day when a bunch of reactionaries can’t tell me that my gay friends down the street are more of a threat to my marriage than some knocked-up teenagers with bad ideas.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments (Closed):2

  1. Alison
    March 4, 2009 at 11:54 am

    Unfortunately my car started yesterday morning so I witnessed the hate-filled display that you’ve described starting with tour buses and church vans swarming the streets around the legislative building and ending with rally participants flocking to their legislators’ offices preaching “family values” with their children, sometimes as young as three or four, in tow.

    Those balloon-toting, NC4Marriage sticker-wearing toddlers would be enough to break my heart any day of the week. Yesterday, though, there was a whole new level personal offense attached. It was my first day back at work following the happiest event of my life thus far— my wedding.

    The hate that those who profess to “defend marriage” hold for other people who share the same basic human need to love and be loved is just astounding. What is there to defend? How could another’s love and subsequent marriage to someone of the opposite or same sex possibly detract from or devalue my relationship with my husband? And why should my relationship be more valued and placed on a pedestal unattainable to so many simply because I am a woman who married a man?

    If I had walked up to any one of the participants at that rally yesterday and told them that I’d just gotten married, I’m sure every single one would have congratulated me or extended best wishes. Maybe that’s the most personally offensive thing of all. I think I would prefer to have never done anything in my life that people like that could approve of.

  2. dmin
    March 4, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Have those that want to model modern society on the Bible forget that, among other things, Polygamy and Slavery were acceptable in the “good old days?” How many of the Patriarchs has multiple wives?