No attorney read the no-bid $100 million State Health Plan contract with Blue Cross before signing

As we noted when the Blue Cross contract with the State Health Plan was first released, the terms are terrible and allow Blue Cross complete control over information and audits. State Auditor Beth Wood agrees. In fact, it was worse than we thought. The State Health Plan underestimated administrative expenses by nearly $40 million because Blue Cross would not let anyone see a break down of its costs.

From the audit:

To create an accurate administrative expense projection, the Plan’s actuary needed to know the costs that constitute the BCBSNC administrative charges and the factors that affect those costs. However, the Plan’s actuary did not have access to the BCBSNC contract. The former Chief Operating Officer said, “Aon never received the BCBS contract due to confidentiality.”

The audit adds:

Consequently, the State Health Plan has agreed to a contract that requires the Plan to reimburse BCBSNC its costs, but does not allow the Plan to verify those costs or even know what they are. Therefore, BCBSNC could charge the Plan for expenses and overhead that Plan management might not agree were true costs of the Plan.

This is an interesting note, because my reading of the contract actually allows Blue Cross to charge the State Health Plan for expenses unrelated to administering the SHP. But since all of the costs are secret, I guess that doesn’t matter.


It is important to note that the cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost type of contract that the Plan used with BCBSNC is not in the best interest of the State. The contract creates a potential conflict of interest for the vendor … The federal government has prohibited the use of such contracts by federal agencies since 1941.

Also, and here’s the kicker, no attorney reviewed the State Health Plan contract with Blue Cross before signing it. The former Director of Network Operations was present during negotiations but “told auditors that she did not act as the Plan’s counsel while negotiating the BCBSNC contract.” That Director who helped negotiate the contract, by the way, now works for Blue Cross.

As the audit notes: “Therefore, no one reviewed the BCBSNC contract from the perspective of an attorney or contract professional on the State Health Plan’s behalf before the Executive Administrator signed the contract.”

A few more thoughts: Despite insistent pleading from us and the State Employees Association of North Carolina legislators passed a harmful State Health Plan bill without publicly calling on Blue Cross to sacrifice anything. When Blue Cross CEO Bob Grezcyn testified before lawmakers there was not a single question asked about this ridiculous contract — even though the contract was then public.

SEANC was dismissed as alarmist when it called for lawmakers to look at overpayments to Blue Cross before hiking out-of-pocket expenses for state employees. With the bizarre cost settlements and outmoded payment scheme it is very likely that the state has paid too much to Blue Cross.

And one last question: Is it a coincidence that the General Assembly passed the State Health Plan bill one week before this audit was released?


  1. Dumped on

    April 30, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    Since we are auditing the plan, (at least what we can) Why don’t we audit the General Assembly. It really appears that some pockets have been padded.

  2. Cat Warren

    April 30, 2009 at 10:04 pm


    Oh, my. I have to say, once again, superb original reporting. This is public money, and yet, somehow, there’s no public accountability, and no transparency. There’s a pattern here, and its corroding public trust in North Carolina government just when we need government to do what it should and, indeed, can do: provide meaningful service to its constituents.

    But the biggest pattern is that NC Policy Watch is doing some of the best journalism to be had in the Triangle. Nice job.

  3. areyoukidding

    April 30, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    Who is to say that just because Beth Wood is an auditor that everything she reports is fact. What she reports is only as good as the information her office receives…for example, the former Director of Network Operations was indeed involved in negotiating the BCBSNC PPO contract from a legal perspective (I probably wouldn’t admit to it either), and there is documentation at the State Health Plan to support this. But obvioulsy the auditor did not receive, or look for, any such supporting documentation, therefore it appears that there was no legal input. Also, That Director used to be General Counsel to guess who…Sen. Tony Rand….Go figure…. Oh yea, That Director was also Treasurer for Sen. Tony Rand’s son’s judgeship campaign.

  4. fedup state emplyee

    May 1, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    someone needs to question or look into if there’s any quid pro quo the relationship between Jack Walker & Tony Rand …

    Also why are the SHP’s actuarial consultants still contracted when it was their projections that caused this financial mess .. what were those projections based on ?? Fiscal research also has their contracted actuarial consultants (Hartman & Assoc) who are still involved in the process and amongst all of these financial experts, the only scapegoat they could find is the fmr exec administrator who lowered plan benefit costs to state employees and instituted a more viable plan from an employee perspective ???

    why is it that the state budget never talks about cutting spending to balance their budgets but always seems to want to find a way to keep feeding their monstrous and fiscally irresponsible spending habits ?

    who’s looking out for state employees now ???? Jack Walker & Tony Rand ? me thinks not !!!

  5. AdamL

    May 1, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Thanks Cat.

  6. ppo web » PPO Contract

    October 15, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    […] 9.The Progressive Pulse – No attorney read the no-bid $100 million What she reports is only as good as the information her office receives…for example, the former Director of Network Operations was indeed involved in negotiating the BCBSNC PPO contract from a legal perspective (I probably wouldn’t admit to it either), and there is documentation at the State Health Plan to support this. http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/04/30/no-attorney-read-the-no-bid-100-million-state-health-plan-contract-with-blue-cross-before-signing/ […]

Check Also

Context is key for understanding Insurance Commissioner’s Affordable Care Act comments

Many people were surprised to see a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Billy Houston, who is under state investigation for allegedly falsified hog lagoon samples in Duplin [...]

As a former police officer and firefighter, Wesley Sewell has encountered odors so putrid that they [...]

When Sarah Jessenia Lopez plead guilty last month to attempted notary fraud related to bail bonding, [...]

Early voting in North Carolina is a big deal with a big turnout, but advocates are bracing for a neg [...]

“How long before we say enough is enough?” state lawmaker Ted Davis Jr. asked his colleagues in the [...]

Like so many people in this state and across this country, I have not gotten over my funk regarding [...]

The easiest way to push back against NC’s rogue General Assembly is to vote against all six proposed [...]

The post It’s getting deep… appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]