4 Comments


  1. Dumped on

    April 30, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    I read the Audit. What it does not include (and it should) is that the Administrator before the last one, ie (Jack Walker) left the plan in dire straits.
    Then they brought him back so he can point fingers at the last one.
    I would also think the auditors would be through enough to NOT address MR. Walker as (Dr.)
    I think they need to audit his application.

  2. Adam Linker

    April 30, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    Great point. No one every points out that Jack Walker ran the SHP into the ground several times before leaving.

  3. Dumped on

    April 30, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    Adam, I am new to the progressive pulse and NC Policy Watch. I discovered it when SEANC listed a link on thier site a few months ago.
    I have worked for the state for 14 years within the DOC. I am very appreciative of your information. Thank You for the work you are doing.
    Not all State Employees are bad and many are proud of the mission we carry out. It has been tough going for awhile now and I simply do not see light at the end of the tunnel.
    I don’t mind the furlough so much (hoping the next 2 months is all) but the State Health plan is going to really sting (I have Parent and children)
    Anyway if I sound crass and negative some I am sorry. Thanks again for your information.
    From dumped on disallusioned State Employee

  4. ananymous

    May 1, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    Valid and reasonable? During plan year 2007-2008, at the time the current shortfalls began, prior approval was required for anything over 24 mental health services annually. Even if you were lucky enough to get Value Options to approve necessary crisis care for a family member, BCBS’s computer systems automatically rejected mental health claims in spite of the valid prior approval. It was necessary to appeal each claim and have it processed by hand. At times it required three or four tries to get reimbursement of less than $50. Occasionally the subscriber received an additional pittance in interest because of the length of time to properly process the claim. Cost plus without transparency and oversight provides no incentive to correct this additional cost and burden to subscribers.

    Value Options and Medco should also be included in reform that brings proper oversight to the State Health Plan.

Check Also

Context is key for understanding Insurance Commissioner’s Affordable Care Act comments

Many people were surprised to see a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

449,235 - Total undergrad enrollment in North Carolina 19,767 - Total for-profit undergrad enrollmen [...]

There’s a new rumor afoot about judicial reform that lawmakers may try to pass a judicial appointmen [...]

The head of North Carolina’s controversial charter takeover program says there’s no guarantee he’ll [...]

UNC Board of Governors Chairman Louis Bissette began the new year by penning a column urging his own [...]

Grand constitutional questions in this country aren’t settled until the Supreme Court has its say, e [...]

The post Gerrymander struck down appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

This past week has been a good one for the state of Alabama. Not only did the Crimson Tide football [...]

Conservative North Carolina lawmakers have pushed through a lot of radical laws and legislative prop [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more