<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mixed messages from the NC Chamber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/05/04/mixed-messages-from-the-nc-chamber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/05/04/mixed-messages-from-the-nc-chamber/</link>
	<description>The Progressive Pulse is a blog about the issues, debates, and people that affect North Carolina public policy. As with the organization that sponsors it, NC Policy Watch, its ultimate objective is to improve the quality of life in the state, in this case by promoting the development of an informed, energetic and progressive online community. The Progressive Pulse welcomes the contributions of interested people of all points of view provided they are of a reasonable length, have some relevance to issues of North Carolina public policy and abide by the common rules of online etiquette (i.e., please avoid inappropriate language and show a measure of respect for others --even the John Locke Foundation). To post a comment, simply click the comment line then provide your name and email. Your email address will not be collected or shared. If you would like to be contributing writer, please send your post to info@ncpolicywatch.com with &#039;blog&#039; in the subject line. If the post meets with our criteria (has a progressive perspective and is relative to our state), we will publish it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:12:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jolson</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/05/04/mixed-messages-from-the-nc-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-35117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=5340#comment-35117</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the buisness could include sick paid days in a COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CONTRACT AGREEMENT. At least it is not illegal for the private sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the buisness could include sick paid days in a COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CONTRACT AGREEMENT. At least it is not illegal for the private sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Schofield</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/05/04/mixed-messages-from-the-nc-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-34978</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=5340#comment-34978</guid>
		<description>But perhaps that&#039;s too harsh. The Chamber COULD be recommending that sick workers stay home WITHOUT pay. Guess that would be consistent -- cruel, mean-spirited and Scrooge-like, but consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But perhaps that&#8217;s too harsh. The Chamber COULD be recommending that sick workers stay home WITHOUT pay. Guess that would be consistent &#8212; cruel, mean-spirited and Scrooge-like, but consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
