Uncategorized

Blowing Smoke About BMI

There’s an interesting report from actuarial consultants Milliman that pours some cold water on the heated debate over State Health Plan costs associated with smokers and people with a high Body Mass Index (BMI). The report, Impact of Height, Weight, and Smoking on Medical Claims Costs, released in April, was an update of Milliman’s Medical Underwriting Guidelines.

Controlling for age and gender, the study found that smokers cost about 9% more than non-smokers. However, when people’s medical histories are known the cost difference is only 5%. The costs associated with BMI are less clear.

The report finds that BMI is not the best way to predict added healthcare costs, even when medical history is known. BMI roughly uses weight divided by height squared and the report finds that weight divided by height cubed (known as Rohrer’s Index) is a better indicator.

Using BMI as a predictor, actual costs are greater for severely underweight and severely overweight people and, for taller people (within a given range of BMI). BMI is also generally criticized because professional athletes can be classified as obese using the measure.

The State Health Plan should be cautious in the use of smoking and BMI criteria for setting premium rates.

4 Comments


  1. Adam Searing

    June 3, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    So, since it costs NC $346/mo in health premiums for each employee, then take a good health history and charge smokers that extra 5% a month (about $17/mo). That’s fair and makes a lot more sense than shoving people into the lowest-rated plans with thousands of dollars more in cost sharing.

  2. Adam Linker

    June 3, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    Or we could just drop the wellness provisions — since state workers are already coughing up plenty of money — and save funds by not paying for worthless drugs and therapies and recouping some of our overpayments to Blue Cross.

  3. EBB

    June 3, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    I go with Adam Linker. Enough research has shown that wellness provisions do not reduce overall health care costs. Early death does.

  4. Pogue Mahone

    June 8, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    Milliman does’t do long term costs, only short term costs. Small Groups average about 3 years with the same carrier. so the carrier is looking for cost project short term, employers would want to look long term.

    But don’t let facts get in the way of a good arguement.

Check Also

Frackuccino

If they won’t tell us what’s in fracking ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

North Carolina’s largest public school system may be warning of “enormous disruptions” without speed [...]

Carol Turner hadn’t lived in North Carolina long before last November’s election. A retired nurse, s [...]

Controversy over class-size requirements in early grades has emerged as the biggest issue facing Nor [...]

The wisdom of the plan by Senate leaders to cut taxes by $839 million was called into question this [...]

Several years of tax cuts have not fixed our economic problems, and more of the same won’t either In [...]

Progress on “second chance” agenda marks a rare positive development in state policy wars There are [...]

24 million---the number of people in the United States who would lose health care coverage by 2026 u [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more