<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top of the morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/06/25/top-of-the-morning-127/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/06/25/top-of-the-morning-127/</link>
	<description>Affecting NC public policy through informed, energetic and progressive conversations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: that guy</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/06/25/top-of-the-morning-127/#comment-38484</link>
		<dc:creator>that guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=6724#comment-38484</guid>
		<description>one of 21 states means that almost half still allow it. that&#039;s not really a compelling statistic for change.

if parents and educators are against it shouldn&#039;t that effectively end corporal punishment even without a law? it seems that if parent and educator opponents should simply target a campaign directed at school systems this would effectively nullify the need for a law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of 21 states means that almost half still allow it. that&#8217;s not really a compelling statistic for change.</p>
<p>if parents and educators are against it shouldn&#8217;t that effectively end corporal punishment even without a law? it seems that if parent and educator opponents should simply target a campaign directed at school systems this would effectively nullify the need for a law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Schofield</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/06/25/top-of-the-morning-127/#comment-38483</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=6724#comment-38483</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s who voted which way:

Total Votes: 46   Ayes: 21   Noes: 25   Not: 0   Exc. Absent: 4   Exc. Vote: 0

Ayes:  Senator(s): Atwater; Basnight; Blue; Boseman; Dannelly; Davis; Foriest; Garrou; Goodall; Graham; Jenkins; Jones; Kinnaird; McKissick; Nesbitt; Purcell; Queen; Rand; Soles; Stein; Vaughan 

Noes: Senator(s): Albertson; Allran; Apodaca; Berger, D.; Berger, P.; Bingham; Blake; Brock; Brown; Brunstetter; Clary; Clodfelter; East; Forrester; Goss; Hoyle; Hunt; Jacumin; Preston; Rouzer; Rucho; Snow; Swindell; Tillman; Weinstein 

Exc. Absence:    Senator(s): Dorsett; Hartsell; Shaw; Stevens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s who voted which way:</p>
<p>Total Votes: 46   Ayes: 21   Noes: 25   Not: 0   Exc. Absent: 4   Exc. Vote: 0</p>
<p>Ayes:  Senator(s): Atwater; Basnight; Blue; Boseman; Dannelly; Davis; Foriest; Garrou; Goodall; Graham; Jenkins; Jones; Kinnaird; McKissick; Nesbitt; Purcell; Queen; Rand; Soles; Stein; Vaughan </p>
<p>Noes: Senator(s): Albertson; Allran; Apodaca; Berger, D.; Berger, P.; Bingham; Blake; Brock; Brown; Brunstetter; Clary; Clodfelter; East; Forrester; Goss; Hoyle; Hunt; Jacumin; Preston; Rouzer; Rucho; Snow; Swindell; Tillman; Weinstein </p>
<p>Exc. Absence:    Senator(s): Dorsett; Hartsell; Shaw; Stevens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/06/25/top-of-the-morning-127/#comment-38478</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=6724#comment-38478</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re talking &quot;North Carolina Time&quot; the answer is 19th century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re talking &#8220;North Carolina Time&#8221; the answer is 19th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

