<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1% sales tax increase six times harder on “working families” than income tax surcharge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/07/26/1-sales-tax-increase-six-times-harder-on-%e2%80%9cworking-families%e2%80%9d-than-income-tax-surcharge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/07/26/1-sales-tax-increase-six-times-harder-on-%e2%80%9cworking-families%e2%80%9d-than-income-tax-surcharge/</link>
	<description>Affecting NC public policy through informed, energetic and progressive conversations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom C</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/07/26/1-sales-tax-increase-six-times-harder-on-%e2%80%9cworking-families%e2%80%9d-than-income-tax-surcharge/#comment-41554</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7516#comment-41554</guid>
		<description>How does 1% of $500 become $39?  Back in the days of old math, 1% of $500 was $5.   If you&#039;re saying the total tax would be $39, that&#039;s fine but it&#039;s an increase from $34 to $39, not from $0 to $39.  The income tax increase is an actual increase regardless of purchasing decisions.  Once taken from the taxpayer, it&#039;s gone and can never be spent by the him/her for any purpose whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does 1% of $500 become $39?  Back in the days of old math, 1% of $500 was $5.   If you&#8217;re saying the total tax would be $39, that&#8217;s fine but it&#8217;s an increase from $34 to $39, not from $0 to $39.  The income tax increase is an actual increase regardless of purchasing decisions.  Once taken from the taxpayer, it&#8217;s gone and can never be spent by the him/her for any purpose whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Progressive Pulse &#8211; Details of the Latest Tax Package</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/07/26/1-sales-tax-increase-six-times-harder-on-%e2%80%9cworking-families%e2%80%9d-than-income-tax-surcharge/#comment-41055</link>
		<dc:creator>The Progressive Pulse &#8211; Details of the Latest Tax Package</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7516#comment-41055</guid>
		<description>[...] objection to the income tax surcharge being imposed on working families. As Elaine Mejia wrote earlier in the week, the proposed 1% sales tax increase would have been far worse on low- and moderate-income [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] objection to the income tax surcharge being imposed on working families. As Elaine Mejia wrote earlier in the week, the proposed 1% sales tax increase would have been far worse on low- and moderate-income [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

