<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dog Days Indeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/</link>
	<description>The Progressive Pulse is a blog about the issues, debates, and people that affect North Carolina public policy. As with the organization that sponsors it, NC Policy Watch, its ultimate objective is to improve the quality of life in the state, in this case by promoting the development of an informed, energetic and progressive online community. The Progressive Pulse welcomes the contributions of interested people of all points of view provided they are of a reasonable length, have some relevance to issues of North Carolina public policy and abide by the common rules of online etiquette (i.e., please avoid inappropriate language and show a measure of respect for others --even the John Locke Foundation). To post a comment, simply click the comment line then provide your name and email. Your email address will not be collected or shared. If you would like to be contributing writer, please send your post to info@ncpolicywatch.com with &#039;blog&#039; in the subject line. If the post meets with our criteria (has a progressive perspective and is relative to our state), we will publish it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:41:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IBXer</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-42125</link>
		<dc:creator>IBXer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-42125</guid>
		<description>Rob, we are talking about healtchare reform here, stay on target.  We are not talking about digital cable.

Obamacare cannot cover everyone, allow your healthcare to remain exactly the same if you want it (this is a cleaver use of wording but is nothing more than an outright lie*), avoid rationing, and lower healthcare cost all at the same time.  It can&#039;t.  This is utopian and based on ideology, not reality.

*Obama keeps saying you can keep your current coverage if you want to.  What the bill says, is that you can keep it for up to 5 years, and, if after that point, your policy is completely unchanged - not even adjusting for inflation - then you can keep it.  So in 5 years, if you have the exact same policy, same deductibles, and you and your insurer have not made any changes to the policy whatsoever, you can keep it.  That will mean no one gets to keep their coverage for more than 5 years because that is not a sustainable business model.  Everyone will then be on The Leader&#039;s plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, we are talking about healtchare reform here, stay on target.  We are not talking about digital cable.</p>
<p>Obamacare cannot cover everyone, allow your healthcare to remain exactly the same if you want it (this is a cleaver use of wording but is nothing more than an outright lie*), avoid rationing, and lower healthcare cost all at the same time.  It can&#8217;t.  This is utopian and based on ideology, not reality.</p>
<p>*Obama keeps saying you can keep your current coverage if you want to.  What the bill says, is that you can keep it for up to 5 years, and, if after that point, your policy is completely unchanged &#8211; not even adjusting for inflation &#8211; then you can keep it.  So in 5 years, if you have the exact same policy, same deductibles, and you and your insurer have not made any changes to the policy whatsoever, you can keep it.  That will mean no one gets to keep their coverage for more than 5 years because that is not a sustainable business model.  Everyone will then be on The Leader&#8217;s plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob B</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41957</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41957</guid>
		<description>IBXer, do you honestly believe I think everyone should get everything they want without paying for it?  Health is a matter of life and death and it&#039;s not a commodity that private industry can handle, which is obvious.  I don&#039;t think we all need digital cable or even a government supplied converter box so we can still watch six channels for free.

The real losers (the ones &quot;loosing,&quot; as you say) are the Republican voters who believe that their Republican representatives care about them and about family values (whatever the hell that means) and smaller government (ha!) and aren&#039;t just pawns for big business who can turn whatever issue they get paid to care about into a heated moral issue, chopped up and processed to please the palate of the uneducated southern whites.

In response to some of the free-marketeers, the problem I have with Libertarians is that while the economy is amoral, there are people at the helm of every business and morals (or lack thereof) come into play whether or not they should.  It&#039;s kind of like those bumper stickers that say &quot;Guns don&#039;t kill people, PEOPLE kill people.&quot;  Those stickers should read &quot;People kill people much more easily with guns.&quot;  Money, like guns, may not be prejudiced, but money does not erase prejudice or cronyism or nepotism or anything else that prevents the best person from having that job or getting that contract, etc.  That&#039;s where the law comes in; that&#039;s where government comes in; that&#039;s where the intervention is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBXer, do you honestly believe I think everyone should get everything they want without paying for it?  Health is a matter of life and death and it&#8217;s not a commodity that private industry can handle, which is obvious.  I don&#8217;t think we all need digital cable or even a government supplied converter box so we can still watch six channels for free.</p>
<p>The real losers (the ones &#8220;loosing,&#8221; as you say) are the Republican voters who believe that their Republican representatives care about them and about family values (whatever the hell that means) and smaller government (ha!) and aren&#8217;t just pawns for big business who can turn whatever issue they get paid to care about into a heated moral issue, chopped up and processed to please the palate of the uneducated southern whites.</p>
<p>In response to some of the free-marketeers, the problem I have with Libertarians is that while the economy is amoral, there are people at the helm of every business and morals (or lack thereof) come into play whether or not they should.  It&#8217;s kind of like those bumper stickers that say &#8220;Guns don&#8217;t kill people, PEOPLE kill people.&#8221;  Those stickers should read &#8220;People kill people much more easily with guns.&#8221;  Money, like guns, may not be prejudiced, but money does not erase prejudice or cronyism or nepotism or anything else that prevents the best person from having that job or getting that contract, etc.  That&#8217;s where the law comes in; that&#8217;s where government comes in; that&#8217;s where the intervention is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old social worker</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41953</link>
		<dc:creator>old social worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41953</guid>
		<description>Big Insurance is the collection of quasi-monopolistic entities who control healthcare that lies outside private pay, Medicare and Medicaid.  The proper libertarian response to BI is to dismantle Medicare and Medicaid (and their pricing minimums), and allow a truly free market in healthcare (with much lower competitive prices) to evolve.

At least I suspect that&#039;s what IBXer is trying to articulate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Insurance is the collection of quasi-monopolistic entities who control healthcare that lies outside private pay, Medicare and Medicaid.  The proper libertarian response to BI is to dismantle Medicare and Medicaid (and their pricing minimums), and allow a truly free market in healthcare (with much lower competitive prices) to evolve.</p>
<p>At least I suspect that&#8217;s what IBXer is trying to articulate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Hill</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41948</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41948</guid>
		<description>Oh, IBXer lighten up. If you support government out of marriage and abortion rights so be it. I just figured since you busted out the &quot;Führer&quot; in your first comment you were one of those Republicans that lost everything in the last few elections. Also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, IBXer lighten up. If you support government out of marriage and abortion rights so be it. I just figured since you busted out the &#8220;Führer&#8221; in your first comment you were one of those Republicans that lost everything in the last few elections. Also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBXer</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41945</link>
		<dc:creator>IBXer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41945</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, you can&#039;t &quot;Give American’s the opportunity to seek their own health care, without their employer and without the government getting in their way&quot; because letting people live their own lives without you forcing your ideals on them is authoritarian, at least according to Mr. Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, you can&#8217;t &#8220;Give American’s the opportunity to seek their own health care, without their employer and without the government getting in their way&#8221; because letting people live their own lives without you forcing your ideals on them is authoritarian, at least according to Mr. Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBXer</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41928</link>
		<dc:creator>IBXer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41928</guid>
		<description>T. Hill, maybe you should have someone edit your writing before you post it because what you just wrote makes no sense.  Or are you joking, I can&#039;t tell.

I am Authoritarian because I want the government to stay out of my every waking moment?  Yet you are anti-authority because you think government should control every aspect of your, and everyone elses, life?  Seriously?  Are you even reading and/or thinking about what you are saying?

Rob, it is utopian to claim that you can give everyone everything they want and they won&#039;t have to pay anything for it.  It is a lie.  People are seeing through it and that is why the democrats are loosing this argument.

The only way Obamacare becomes law now is if they strong arm it onto the American people in defiance of our will.  That will be the end of your party.  The leadership knows this now but will keep up the talking points so they don&#039;t offend their base.  they know the fight is lost, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T. Hill, maybe you should have someone edit your writing before you post it because what you just wrote makes no sense.  Or are you joking, I can&#8217;t tell.</p>
<p>I am Authoritarian because I want the government to stay out of my every waking moment?  Yet you are anti-authority because you think government should control every aspect of your, and everyone elses, life?  Seriously?  Are you even reading and/or thinking about what you are saying?</p>
<p>Rob, it is utopian to claim that you can give everyone everything they want and they won&#8217;t have to pay anything for it.  It is a lie.  People are seeing through it and that is why the democrats are loosing this argument.</p>
<p>The only way Obamacare becomes law now is if they strong arm it onto the American people in defiance of our will.  That will be the end of your party.  The leadership knows this now but will keep up the talking points so they don&#8217;t offend their base.  they know the fight is lost, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Obama Health Care Failure as of August 11, 2009</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41871</link>
		<dc:creator>COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Obama Health Care Failure as of August 11, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41871</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Hill</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41869</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41869</guid>
		<description>IBXer, the Nazis were Authoritarians.

Just like you.

The economic model they ascribed to had no impact on bossing people around.

As a Capitalist Libertarian, I assure you that the Nazi&#039;s had both wrong. You being half right, just makes you scream louder but still makes you half Authoritarian idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBXer, the Nazis were Authoritarians.</p>
<p>Just like you.</p>
<p>The economic model they ascribed to had no impact on bossing people around.</p>
<p>As a Capitalist Libertarian, I assure you that the Nazi&#8217;s had both wrong. You being half right, just makes you scream louder but still makes you half Authoritarian idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBXer</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41865</link>
		<dc:creator>IBXer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41865</guid>
		<description>Old Social, &quot;Big Insurance&quot;, whatever that is supposed to be, has never set out to cause the death of hundreds of millions of people.  Government, in its many forms, has.

Rob, the Nazis were socialists.  Socialists always think that they are doing what is right by forcing their utopian ideals upon everyone else.  The Nazis believed that and so do modern day socialists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Social, &#8220;Big Insurance&#8221;, whatever that is supposed to be, has never set out to cause the death of hundreds of millions of people.  Government, in its many forms, has.</p>
<p>Rob, the Nazis were socialists.  Socialists always think that they are doing what is right by forcing their utopian ideals upon everyone else.  The Nazis believed that and so do modern day socialists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old social worker</title>
		<link>http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2009/08/11/dog-days-indeed/comment-page-1/#comment-41852</link>
		<dc:creator>old social worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/?p=7850#comment-41852</guid>
		<description>Curious that the fringe right sees universal healthcare as a bigger threat than big insurance.  Perhaps none of them or their loved ones have experienced a severe illness or had their coverage cancelled or denied when they most needed it.

More than a few of the protesters, including the irrespressable Dallas Woodhouse, appear clinically obese, making them targets for potential policy cancellation under the current system.

&quot;Keep your government hands off my Medicare&quot; pretty much sums up the rational capabilities of the protesters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious that the fringe right sees universal healthcare as a bigger threat than big insurance.  Perhaps none of them or their loved ones have experienced a severe illness or had their coverage cancelled or denied when they most needed it.</p>
<p>More than a few of the protesters, including the irrespressable Dallas Woodhouse, appear clinically obese, making them targets for potential policy cancellation under the current system.</p>
<p>&#8220;Keep your government hands off my Medicare&#8221; pretty much sums up the rational capabilities of the protesters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
