Uncategorized

Who wants an effective health care system? Not Sen. Burr.

I actually took the time to read Sen. Richard Burr’s hash of a health care bill called The Patients’ Choice Act.

There is certainly no shortage of provisions to criticize in the legislation, but the most surprising is Burr’s elimination of comparative effectiveness research.

Even conservative physicians I’ve spoken to generally support comparative effectiveness research, or CER. CER involves, for example, reviewing the literature or conducting new tests on multiple artificial knees to see which knee is the safest and most effective. You would then disseminate that information to hospitals, physicians, and other providers.

Proposals in Congress fund more of this type of research and house it in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, or AHRQ, at the Department of Health and Human Services. Reviewing the studies and conducting research under the bills in Congress would fall to actual researchers, scientists, and physicians.

Not surprisingly, medical device makers and drug companies aren’t too fond of CER. They prefer to take doctors out to dinner and give them pens that explain why their artificial knee or pain medication is the best on the market. We don’t need any of this head-to-head testing stuff.

Sen. Burr tends to often agree with medical device makers and drug companies, so his legislation would eliminate the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Now eliminating all effectiveness research would be a bit obvious, even for Burr.
So instead of a robust agency encouraging this line of investigation, Burr establishes a Health Care Services Commission, which is five people. Yes, Burr wants to replace AHRQ with five people.

No worries, though, Burr would have these five folks overseeing a newly established Forum for Quality and Effectiveness in Health Care. The Forum would consist of 15 people “nominated by private sector health care organizations.” Great, because industry is much better than scientists at figuring out what works and does not work. And industry certainly has the objectivity and credibility to disseminate information to doctors.

Burr also strips out the mandate to conduct head-to-head Consumer Reports style comparisons of medical technology.

I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised that Burr eviscerates CER because his bill includes no proven strategies to contain health costs over time. Nothing. I also shouldn’t be surprised that Burr would so blatantly pander to big spending special interests. It’s sort of his hallmark.

Check Also

Context is key for understanding Insurance Commissioner’s Affordable Care Act comments

Many people were surprised to see a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Crumbling ceilings. Failing air conditioning and heating systems. Broken down school buses. Mold inf [...]

This story has been updated with comments from Jim Womack, who did not respond earlier to questions. [...]

For the 18 months, Gary Brown has been traveling through northeastern North Carolina like an itinera [...]

It will be at least another month before state Superintendent Mark Johnson can take over at the helm [...]

Last week, the General Assembly announced which legislators will serve on the Joint Legislative Task [...]

The latest effort in Washington to repeal and not actually replace the Affordable Care Act has a dif [...]

Conservative group “reviewing” bigoted attacks; funding from major NC corporations implicated Nearly [...]

5---number of days since Senators Bill Cassidy and Lindsey Graham unveiled a new proposal to repeal [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more