2 Comments


  1. Mar Matthias Darin

    October 17, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    What I’ve noticed most is the lack of mentioning those that suffer weight issues not from eating but from medical issues like thyroid disorders, cancer, and so on.

    The second issue that I can see is the possibility of discrimination followed by a whopper law suit. Calling it a “fat tax” is an open invitation for a suit.

    It would be better to refer to these items as a “sweets tax” or “luxury foods tax” which is also more applicable to the intent.

  2. Tax Reserves

    August 17, 2010 at 5:39 am

    I’ve noticed that It became a big problem and The chief executive of Sainsbury’s Justin King last week cautioned that a ‘fat tax’ might be applied to some food products by the new coalition government in the next budget, as it looks to cut mounting debt.
    —————————-
    kathy

Check Also

Context is key for understanding Insurance Commissioner’s Affordable Care Act comments

Many people were surprised to see a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Wake County judge rejects legislature's last-minute rule change on candidate party affiliation [...]

Earlier this month, the youth-led group Triangle People Power held a showing of “The Bail Trap,” a d [...]

The evening started well for Vista Green. Wood Beasley III tried to dazzle the Northampton County Pl [...]

At a standing-room only gathering to discuss the six proposed amendments to the North Carolina const [...]

A summer of hectic twists and turns has made it increasingly clear: The North Carolina General Assem [...]

The highest profile public policy debate in North Carolina in the summer of 2018 revolves around the [...]

The post Ship of State in a bottle… appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

A decade ago, the entire nation suffered through a financial crisis that led to the brink of a globa [...]