Home > Uncategorized > New report: “Charter schools’ political success is a civil rights failure”

New report: “Charter schools’ political success is a civil rights failure”

Post on February 4, 2010 by 11 Comments »

Experts at the University of California, Los Angeles’ Civil Rights Project (Proyecto Derechos Civiles) released a new report today that raises fresh questions about charter schools and their contribution to ongoing re-segregation of public education in America. The report, “Choice Without Equity: Charter School Segregation and the Need for Civil Rights Standards,” is, according to a press release that accompanied it:

a nationwide report based on an analysis of Federal government data and an examination of charter schools in 40 states and the District of Columbia, along with several dozen metropolitan areas with large enrollments of charters. The report found that charter schools continue to stratify students by race, class, and possibly language, and are more racially isolated than traditional public schools in virtually every state and large metropolitan area in the country.”

The release goes on to say:

The study’s key findings suggest that charter schools, particularly those in the western United States are havens for white re-segregation from public schools; requirements for providing essential equity data to the federal government go unmet across the nation; and magnet schools are overlooked, in spite of showing greater levels of integration and academic achievement than charters.”

As for what to do about it:

The study offers several recommendations for restoring equity provisions and integration in charter schools, including establishing new guidance and reporting requirements by the Federal government; federal funding opportunities for magnet schools, which have a documented legacy of reducing racial isolation and improving student outcomes; and incorporating some features of magnet schools into charter schools. The report also recommends heightened enforcement of existing state-level legislation with specific provisions regarding diversity in charter schools, and monitoring patterns of charter school enrollment and attrition, focusing particularly on reporting the demographic information of charter school students on low-income and ELL characteristics.”

Sounds like a “must read” for North Carolina lawmakers, education officials and, ideally, charter school advocates, before the state revisits the issue of lifting its statutory charter school cap above its present level.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments (Closed):11

  1. Rob Schofield
    February 4, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    North Carolina data accompanying the report show similarly disheartening data on re-segregation.

  2. Jeff
    February 4, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    The only data worth reading is the end result. How well do normal public school students do when compared to charter schools and even private or homeschooled students?

    “Equity does not equal Civil Rights when it is the individual who is discriminated against as compared to a block of society”…Jeff Austin

  3. IBXer
    February 4, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    This report and its authors are disgusting. Arguing that we should keep every child in bad public schools to promote an arbitrary standard of equality is wretched.

  4. James
    February 4, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    The “what to do about it” section seems right on the money to me. And I’d go even farther in mandating diversity, both among students and teachers.

    For the record, I want to see charter schools “chartered” by and to people who already understand the importance of diversity: our current public education professionals. I’d like to see school boards drive this agenda … spawning a resurgence in small schools, free from the insane requirements that come with gigantic campuses – in order to reallocated capital dollars to teacher salaries.

    Rather than lose the battle of charter schools, progressives should take up the banner and set the agenda. We’ve been reactive on this issue for too long … not at all aligned with what most of us would say are progressive ideals. As a result, we’re losing the chance to shape the debate. Obama is taking this on as a national priority. We should be too.

  5. Rob Schofield
    February 4, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    I hear ya, James. God knows our public schools are and have long been full of flaws — bureaucracy, racism, and so on.

    I think it would be extremely helpful if progressive charter school supporters and progressive critics could engage in some kind of productive dialogue.

    While I agree that just saying “no” isn’t always a recipe for long-term solutions, it goes both ways. Many of us charter school skeptics have long found it tremendously frustrating to watch our progressive friends and allies who happen to like charters making common cause with the hard core, far right ideologues who want to wreck the public schools completely.

    Figuring out a way to bend this issue in the progressive direction (without abetting the work of wingnuts) is a real challenge.

  6. James
    February 4, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    Thanks. Just to be clear, I don’t want to make common cause with the free-market extremists. I want to make them irrelevant. If we can use them to get something important done, let lead. If the stand in the way, let’s run over them.

    The Puppets have been on this jag for years and have nothing to show for it. Let’s zero in on solving the problem and then get it done – the right way. With safeguards for diversity, for balance, for traditional schools, for teachers.

    For example, I’d like to see a 50% increase in teacher pay. Not a five percent or two percent.

  7. Jeff
    February 4, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    How’s this for wing nut…. NC Dept of Ed. wants to only teach US History starting at 1877 up to today in high school. Never mind the rest of it, the kids will get to touch on our founding in middle school.

    Call me nutty if you must, I’ll sprout wings and leave you all with your diversified progressive bastardization of reality to figure out where all the producers and doers have gone.

  8. IBXer
    February 5, 2010 at 11:36 am

    Jeff, history is the enemy of the progressive ideology.

  9. J.
    February 5, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    In North Carolina, charter schools have a higher percentage of African-American students than other public schools do. Is an unconscious racism at work in the criticism of the alleged “segregation” of North Carolina charter schools? Aren’t the critics in essence saying to African-American parents that they know better than the parents do where their children ought to be educated?

  10. Jeff
    February 5, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    J there is a bias against the individual in our education system. When we use diversity to lump people into groups it becomes the cage that they are expected to live and die in.

  11. Steve Harrison
    February 5, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    It’s not “alleged”, J. Even the Family Prejudice Council admits it’s true:

    http://www.ncfamily.org/FNC/0709S3.html

    “The NCCPPR also claims that charter schools “remain more racially segregated than traditional public schools as a whole.” While this observation may be factual, it ignores the intent behind the law regarding the student makeup of charter schools.

    The 1996 law requires the student population of charter schools to “reasonably reflect the racial and ethnic composition of the general population residing within the local school administrative unit in which the school is located or the racial and ethnic composition of the special population that the school seeks to serve residing within the local school administrative unit in which the school is located.”

    Regardless of the goals of each charter school, the end result is a higher rate of racial segregation.