Uncategorized

Why judicial elections are scary (hint: see the 2010 Court of Appeals race)

ruffinI usually confine my comments to health care because it’s the topic I spend my time studying.

But I do have a bit of experience with judicial races as I worked with the campaigns of Judges Linda McGee and Alan Thornburg on the North Carolina Court of Appeals. After the campaign I wrote an editorial for the News & Observer (that I think you now have to pay to see) entitled “Judicial Elections Don’t Work”. During that campaign various interest groups tried to convince judges to take pledges and make ironclad promises.

There is intense pressure to engage in the type of electioneering behavior that undermines the independence of the judiciary.

Howard Manning was likely not elected in 2004, for example, because he asked that the Republican Party not endorse him in the non-partisan Supreme Court race. Justice Paul Newby had no such reservations, and his name was sent out to thousands of Republicans across the state. Taking the high road rarely works in judicial elections. But the high road is the one we want our judges traveling.

That brings me to the 2010 race where the right-wing candidate Steven Walker is running for the Court of Appeals. How qualified is Walker to join that august body of jurists? He graduated from Campbell law in 2005 and has clerked on the Supreme Court for four years. Clerking, for those who don’t know, is working as a research assistant for a judge or justice. You read trial transcripts and briefs and work with your judge or justice to assemble an opinion.

Keep in mind that Walker is running against Judge Rick Elmore, a deeply experienced Republican judge. The problem, in Walker’s worldview, is that Elmore is just not Republican enough. There are actually several experienced candidates in the race. But with low turnout motivated tea partiers could put an ideologue and neophyte on the bench.

Walker’s website is filled with coded language to let you know that he is a proud member of the far right fringe. He says:

A vote for Steven will be a vote in returning the judiciary to its proper place–not an oligarchy to rule over the people, but a safeguard of the people’s rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Here is the first sentence under “Interests”:

Steven has been interested in firearms for a large portion of his life.

I see.

I suppose something good could come from electing Walker Texas Ranger to the Court of Appeals — maybe it would motivate the General Assembly to scrap our silly method of picking judges.

6 Comments


  1. The Gourmez

    April 5, 2010 at 11:04 pm

    Do you have an opinion on what would be a better way to get a more impartial group of judges than elections?

  2. AdamL

    April 6, 2010 at 8:51 am

    There are a number of preferable methods. I’m sort of partial to the idea of a bi-partisan commission that vets nominees and forwards two or three names to guv for final approval. Then the judges and justices could stand for retention elections.

  3. Gavel Grab » Tuesday Media Summary

    April 6, 2010 at 11:24 am

    […] The Progressive Pulse: Why judicial elections are scary (hint: see the 2010 Court of Appeals race) Adam Linker – 4/5/2010 […]

  4. […] elections as a means to select its state judges. Yesterday, North Carolina blogger Adam Linker denounced judicial elections as “scary” pursuits that are likely to compromise judicial independence on […]

  5. John H

    May 4, 2010 at 10:00 pm

    You sure saw this one coming! Looks like Walker’s going to win. A little organization goes a long way on these unpublicized races.

  6. […] few weeks ago I fretted that law clerk Steven Walker could ride his favorable ballot placement and right wing ties to a […]

Check Also

Context is key for understanding Insurance Commissioner’s Affordable Care Act comments

Many people were surprised to see a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

DEQ cites Greensboro and Reidsville for illegal discharges of 1,4-Dioxane into Haw River and its tri [...]

Last week, education policymakers, researchers, foundations and corporate executives gathered for a [...]

Property company must pay $22,000, but other actors in dumping scheme have yet to be held accountabl [...]

Members of the UNC Board of Governors publicly condemned member Tom Fetzer’s secret, independent inv [...]

The post A real turkey… appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

“The hymn in church yesterday,” Dan Gerlach, the embattled former ECU interim chancellor, tweeted Su [...]

Back in the early 1990’s, the late and sorely missed Bob Hensley – a talented, feisty and frequently [...]

The post Berger on shaky ground appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]