Uncategorized

Where are the privacy concerns with random State Health Plan testing?

Gov. Perdue and Attorney General Roy Cooper are in my hometown of Greenville today to announce a new program that will collect DNA from people accused of serious crimes. Those DNA samples will be stored in a state database.

Privacy advocates are rightly concerned about taking bits of DNA from people accused, but not convicted, of crimes.

This plan is reminiscent of legislation passed by the General Assembly that authorizes the State Health Plan to contract with a private company to randomly cheek swab public employees and test those samples for evidence of nicotine use. The State Health Plan has decided not to conduct the tests for now, but it retains the authority to begin swabbing at any time.

The two cases are not perfectly analogous. The chunks of cheek collected from state workers will presumably not be stored and will not be used for purposes other than catching smokers. But the issues raise similar privacy concerns. Yet the case of DNA collection from criminal suspects has received huge amounts of press attention and serious, thoughtful objections. Meanwhile, the random testing of state employees generated few stories in the press and not a whiff of opposition from privacy advocates. Rep. Pricey Harrison was the only person to publicly express reservations about the policy in a committee meeting (and I attended nearly every relevant committee meeting).

We should not have to rely on the magnanimity of State Health Plan leadership to ensure the privacy of state workers. The General Assembly should strip away the authority to conduct random tests. And I hope we will hear more from those protecting our rights to live our lives and do our jobs without having our DNA swabbed from our cheeks.

3 Comments


  1. […] Original post by Adam Linker […]

  2. Paul

    July 16, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    Adam,

    I am a state employee and I do not want to subsidize the health care of my fellow employees who smoke. I would also like to stop subsidizing the health care for state employees who have a waist girth that is more than 50% of their height.

    With rights to benefits, there should also be responsibilities to those who are sharing in the costs.

  3. AdamL

    July 19, 2010 at 10:19 am

    I don’t blame you. I also wouldn’t want, and almost none of the state employees I know want, random cheek swabs and blood tests. You would be subjected to these tests even if you declare that you do not smoke.

Check Also

Context is key for understanding Insurance Commissioner’s Affordable Care Act comments

Many people were surprised to see a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

A key House committee signed off on the chamber’s public school budget report Thursday, despite Demo [...]

Harold Brubaker, the former Republican House Speaker turned powerful lobbyist, tried to ram through [...]

A bill to limit local regulation of small cell towers is moving to a full House vote, despite concer [...]

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that the North Carolina GOP drew unconstitutionally racially ger [...]

The most shameful thing about the disastrous budget passed by the Senate two weeks ago is not the vi [...]

Court setbacks, public opinion, progressive activism and Trump bode ill for NC conservatives Profess [...]

So, the question as always comes down to one of vision. The elected chieftains who decide how much m [...]

2.8 billion---amount in dollars of needs in communities across the state for rebuilding efforts from [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more