Uncategorized

NC Supreme Court: Life means life, regardless of good behavior

The state Supreme Court ruled Friday that two convicted killers must remain incarcerated, despite their claims that their life sentences should be reduced because of credits for good behavior.

Attorneys for Faye Brown and Alford Jones argued that when the two were sentenced in the 1970s life terms were defined as “80 years” by the legislature. They maintained over time credits for their work and good behavior cut their sentences in half.

In a 5-2 ruling, the high court determined that regardless of such merit time, there was no regulation explicitly stipulating that the credits were to be used to calculate an unconditional release date.

Associate Justice Patricia Timmons-Goodson wrote in her dissent that the decision “offends” common notions of fundamental fairness:

This decision violates the DOC’s own regulations and policies, Jones’s constitutional rights, and the doctrine of separation of powers. And by doing so, I fear that a cornerstone of our legal system, the writ of habeas corpus, is devalued.

You can read the full opinion here.

3 Comments


  1. Victor Erimita

    August 27, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    On reading this decision, one has to ask if elected judges can ever be effective protectors of the least in society.

    These persons are surely the least. How hard would it be to stick your neck out and say, sure, you hate them electorate, but they did their time and we can’t go changing the rules now to keep them in.

  2. James

    August 27, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Victor makes an excellent point.

  3. Jack

    August 30, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    The “…least…”! The word reflects how society views people who have been convicted of a crime. It’s contemptuous language and tags people as a prime target for discrimination, employment and financial to name two.

    Whether elected or appointed judges are in the political arena. I would prefer that judges stay beholding to the electorate for their jobs rather than people in smoked fill rooms.

Check Also

The Week’s Top Five on NC Policy Watch

1. The Right wages class warfare in Washington ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

A pivotal legislative task force may be just beginning its dive into North Carolina’s school funding [...]

The controversy over “Silent Sam,” the Confederate monument on UNC’s Chapel Hill campus, has been ra [...]

North Carolina tries to mine its swine and deal with a poop problem that keeps piling up A blanket o [...]

This story is part of "Peak Pig," an examination of the hog industry co-published with Env [...]

Republicans in Congress are rushing to advance a tax reform bill that balloons the federal deficit s [...]

The post Charitable donations and the GOP’s chopping block appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

13---percentage of households in the U.S. that were food insecure on average from 2014-2016. Meaning [...]

Five years ago, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a jaw-dropping civil rights lawsuit again [...]

Spotlight on Journalism

We invite you to join a special celebration of investigative journalism! The evening will feature Mike Rezendes, a member of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Boston Globe Spotlight Team known for their coverage of the cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church.

Tickets available NOW!

Spotlight On Journalism

This event will benefit NC Policy Watch, a project of the North Carolina Justice Center. Sponsorship opportunities available now!

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more