Home > Uncategorized > Tedesco at risk of foreclosure

Tedesco at risk of foreclosure

Post on January 19, 2011 by 37 Comments »

The foreclosure crisis, with more than one million American homes put in proceedings last year, has ensnared one of Wake County’s more polarizing figures, school board member John Tedesco.

In court filings, Tedesco’s Garner home on Rock Fish Lane had foreclosure proceedings started against it on Jan. 4, according to public court documents found in the Wake County Courthouse. A May 4th hearing is scheduled at the Wake County Clerk of Courts office, with a foreclosure sale date on the courthouse steps taking place later in the month, on May 25.

Lawyers for Brock & Scott, a firm that handles a significant amount of foreclosure work in the state,  moved to foreclose on Tedesco’s home because of “failure to make payments of principal and interest” on the $217,500 mortgage he took out in 2007, according to copies of the foreclosure proceedings.

Tedesco, when reached by phone, said he’s been trying to get a loan modification through his servicer, Chase Manhattan, and that the filing of foreclosure papers at the courthouse is part of that process.

“I’ve been working with my lender through the home modification process,” Tedesco said. “And part of that process is setting a (hearing) date.”

He’s been out of work since April, when he left his position with Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle. Tedesco said he’s been living off his savings, and began looking for a job three months ago now that he’s exhausted his savings.

For those who may have missed it, Tedesco’s been on the national radar a lot this month, including last night when Comedy Central’s Stephen Colbert took the new school board to task for their “disintegration” of Wake County schools.

“What’s the use of living in a gated community if my kids go to school and get poor all over them?” Colbert asked.

To see the segment, click here.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments (Closed):35

  1. Jeff S
    January 19, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    I haven’t been a fan of John in the past, but can honestly say I’m disappointed to see this post appear here.

    I don’t believe his personal finances are relevant to the position he holds.

  2. HunterC
    January 19, 2011 at 8:01 pm

    He votes on a multi-million dollar school system budget. And he’s voted to needlessly waste money already.

    The PUBLIC records of his financial acumen are certainly relevant to the position he holds.

    Further, you can bet your bottom dollar credit checks are performed on school system finance administrators. Surely the ones who hold public office and get to vote on budget items deserve some scrutiny.

  3. Jennifer
    January 19, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    I agree with Jeff–this isn’t relevant.

  4. AdamL
    January 19, 2011 at 8:27 pm

    A foreclosure against a prominent politicians seems newsworthy.

    And maybe it will make conservative pundits like Roy Cordato rethink their position that loan modification is a “moral hazard”.

  5. AdamL
    January 19, 2011 at 8:28 pm
  6. Joe
    January 19, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    Jeff & Jennifer, hats off to you. Whether you agree with John’s policies or not, this is tabloid-quality news.

  7. HunterC
    January 19, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    I’m willing to entertain an intellectually consistent position from those who think this “irrelevant” if they also agree that credit checks for folks like CFOs at non-profits or the like are also “irrelevant.”

    It’s clear that I think such information is relevant, but is there a school of thought that Jeff/Jennifer/Joe and others subscribe to where general — public — financial information (not dining or grocery lists, but foreclosures) are to be overlooked?

    Is there a larger movement for getting rid of credit checks for jobs with financial responsibility?

  8. Jody
    January 19, 2011 at 9:06 pm

    He made the momentous decision to act (quit his job) with no consideration of the outcome (financial disaster). At least he’s consistent.

    Clearly ideology trumped common financial sense and his fiduciary responsibility to his lender. That is absolutely relevant to the position he holds. Is this the person we want managing a billion-dollar school system?

  9. Harry
    January 19, 2011 at 9:19 pm

    Anyone else laughing over the hypocrisy?

  10. jim black
    January 19, 2011 at 10:36 pm

    Thanks progressive pulse for contributing to the politics of personal destruction.

  11. Jay
    January 19, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    I agree with Jody!

  12. Steve Harrison
    January 20, 2011 at 12:14 am

    It’s an unfortunate situation for John and I do feel some sympathy for him, but for those who think this is not relevant, consider this:

    Very often when elected officials find themselves in financial troubles, people step up to help them out. And sometimes those people expect something in return. It doesn’t always happen. But it happens. My point is, it’s a potential weakness that could be exploited, turning a normally ethical elected official into something else.

    And that’s why it needs to be made public, so that elected official will be more inclined to rise above the temptation.

  13. Dallas Woodhouse
    January 20, 2011 at 12:25 am

    cheap shot

  14. AdamL
    January 20, 2011 at 7:33 am

    Dallas Woodhouse is accusing someone of taking a cheap shot. Wow.

  15. William Murrat
    January 20, 2011 at 8:21 am

    I guess this ranks right up there with our State Auditor not paying her property taxes, or Geithner not paying his income taxes. It’s a non-story unless it happens to be a conservative.

  16. Adam Searing
    January 20, 2011 at 9:51 am

    Yeah, those financial stories concerning the real estate of public officials are always overblown – like that one where that NC Governor bought a house down at the coast well below market rate while regulators were considering development approvals. Totally irrelevant, and I’m glad that it didn’t get reported very far or amount to much. There wasn’t any comment on it either from folks like Civitas or Americans for Prosperity, etc.

    Of course, it was on the front page of the weighty “Carolina Journal”, but that doesn’t count:

    http://www.johnlocke.org/acrobat/cjPrintEdition/cj-june-2006-web.pdf

  17. Tothepoint
    January 20, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    Philosophical
    This is an example of poor tabloid reporting.

    This is an example of trying to relish the misfortune of another.

    Overall a bad choice of reporting. While I often disagree with the philosophical direction of most of the social issues raised here, I respect the debate.

    But this is nothing more than a petty personal hit job. Bad form.

    I have seen postings whereby progressive supporters bash the foreclosure process as needlessly hurting the homeowner.

    But since it is John Tedesco, who clearly Policy Watch advocates hate simply because he advocates another approach that they have already prejudged as a failure, then I guess Ms. Ovaska feels it is OK.

    With all the worthy stories to be told concerning the state’s budget issues, the impact it will have on people, communities, etc…, I find it somewhat pitiful that this is the best she can do.

    Great hire Policy Watch.

  18. Andrew Snee
    January 20, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    There’s nothing in the article that encourages anyone to take pleasure in his misery. It might even have the opposite effect of creating sympathy — that is, unless you don’t think we should have sympathy for people in financial hard times.

  19. HunterC
    January 20, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    @Tothepoint: WTF?

    Numerous foreclosure stories have used examples of real people — even sometimes a reporter/author themselves — to demonstrate the utter failure of the rule of law and judicial system in this country in favor of corporate monstrosities.

    No one in this post has wished ill on Tedesco.

    In fact, AdamL above (@8:27) uses this story of a foreclosure to call for more empathy and a rethinking of “moral hazard” visited on individuals rather than corporations.

    I’m not sure I’m ready to go there, but it’s plain to see in the writings above.

    You’re just setting up straw men to knock them down.

    If you were really concerned about budget matters and the impact monetary decisions made by elected officials have on people, you should consider this Tedesco story a worthy place to explore many topics — school district budgets, privacy issues (credit checks) before job hires, HAMP, loan modification, foreclosure processes in NC, or a host of other issues.

    This is a worthy story that speaks to many things. You’re just choosing to make this about a “bad” reporter when you could be doing so many other things you claim to be interested in.

  20. Sarah Ovaska
    January 20, 2011 at 3:37 pm

    Thanks everyone for your comments. As expected, this blog posting about John Tedesco’s foreclosure proceedings has generated a bit of controversy. I wanted to shed some light on why NC Policy Watch decided to publish this information as we did.

    As a general rule, I believe the public deserves to be informed about the people they have voted for, or those they voted against, and who are making major decisions about public institutions. The decline of media in our state and nation is making that more difficult for voters, given that we have less reporters doing routine checks like this on our elected officials.

    In Mr. Tedesco’s case, he’s a member of a school board that is looking at major budgetary concerns, employs a huge number of people in the county and is tasked with educating the more than 140,000 children who live in Wake County. The decisions he makes are enormously important, to say the least.

    When his financial troubles enter into the public realm, which it did with the public filing of the foreclosure proceedings in the Wake County Courthouse, then the public is entitled to know about it and can make their own decisions about whether they think it is consequential or not.

    The position he holds is one that’s attracted a lot of attention as of late, and there may be questions about whether his financial hardships could affect the decisions he makes, detract from the hours he’s put in as a school board member or even make him susceptible to bribery as has happened with other public officials.

    I certainly spent time considering the effects of what I reported yesterday before I did publish the piece. But I ultimately decided to publish it because I believe it was in the public’s best interest.

    On a side note, I think his predicament also shows the far reaches of this foreclosure crisis, something I’ve written about before. I did a report earlier this year about the lack of modifications coming through for homeowners (http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/cms/2010/11/25/hampered-by-hamp-as-foreclosures-rise/). Most of my time at Policy Watch is dedicated to doing investigations along those lines, and I’d encourage anyone who has story ideas to email me at sarah@ncpolicywatch.com.

  21. Steve
    January 20, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Mmm. This examination of private finances of a public figure sets a dangerous precedent, Policywatch. It’s not like Tedesco is suspected of embezzlement, is it? Pretty tabloid stuff.

  22. John
    January 20, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    Those of you that think that Tedesco’s inability to manage his personal finances is not a reflection on his ability to manage the much larger and more complex finances of Wake’s schools have your head in the sand. It matters not what his politics are……this is a question of judgement. What if he was driving drunk or not paying his taxes or being a bad parent…..opps he doesn’t have children. Maybe he should be using his time to go to work so he can pay his bills instead of reforming the school system.

  23. Janie
    January 20, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    It’s particularly relevant as the Wake County GOP is now publicly asking people to send “gifts” in support of Mr. Tedesco. Don’t let those pesky ethics laws stop you….WTH?

  24. Em
    January 20, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    If it were Mr. Obama going into foreclosure some folks would be all over the story like flies on roadkill. And loving every minute of it.

    Anytime a public figure who is influential in how my tax money is spent gets in financial trouble, i sure as heck want to know about it. Lucky Mr. Tedesco is not in my school district.

    It sounds from the description that he might have some emotional trouble that needs attention. I wonder why someone like this man, no doubt with all sorts of contacts, can’t find another job, makes me wonder what the rest of the story is. And what the next installment will be……………

  25. bchgrl
    January 20, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    Obviously Mr. Tedesco has seen the rough side of the current economy just like all of us have. This article has no bearing on his personal finances, nor should it have anything to do with his ability to serve on the board. Mr. Tedesco is an upstanding citizen who has been caught in the net of a loan modification, just like millions of others. Leave him alone and let him continue on with his great work in Wake County.

  26. David
    January 20, 2011 at 8:27 pm

    I think he should have thought twice before quitting his job in the first place. Then maybe he could continue paying his mortgage.

  27. Alex O.
    January 20, 2011 at 8:48 pm

    I saw an interview with him when he quit his job. He was sitting on his front porch. I do not like the man’s vision for the schools but it was clear back then he knew what peril he was in financially but felt what he was doing with the school board was that important to him. He was never trying to hide his financial situation. I see no shame in it. I have great respect for a man who will follow his convictions.

  28. xyzzy
    January 20, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    The Wake GOP is claiming that Tedesco had to leave his job because “liberals” threatened to cut off funding for Big Brothers/Big Sisters over his school board antics.

    If there is any truth to that, it’s despicable (and I can’t stand Tedesco).

    However, as WRAL points out in their story, when he quit BB/BS in April, he said:

    “Short of losing some sleep and personal time, I don’t think I’ve paid a price for the opportunity to serve the community,” he said in April of his decision. “I wanted to make a bigger commitment to our community and our kids.”

    (see WRAL story at: http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/8969332/).

    So his story appears to have changed. I don’t think anyone except John and his former bosses at BB/BS will ever know the truth for sure.

  29. Vik
    January 20, 2011 at 8:53 pm

    Mr. Tedesco would relish the opportunity to jump on an opponent in the same position.

  30. Joe
    January 20, 2011 at 11:28 pm

    Vik, now you’re a mind reader? Can you hit me with next week’s winning lotto numbers?

    John had great love for BB/BS and would never want to do anything to damage their standing in the community or ability to help kids. Even now, he’s asking that any donations to that well-intentioned but misguided attempt to help him be donated to BB/BS. The story about how he came to resign is true. When he left, John focused on how he could dedicate more time toward helping students because he knew if the full story came out it would damage BB/BS, ultimately hurting the kids who benefit from their programs. Regardless of the circumstances surrounding his ouster from BB/BS, I hope there isn’t a backlash against them, because it would be a backlash against kids who need our help.

  31. frankbunc
    January 20, 2011 at 11:51 pm

    If a Democrat and/or Liberal has the same problems Tedesco has and there was a public filing, you danged well betcha that you-know-who would be all over it like you know what, and loudly. I will be looking in the Locke Rag (Carolina Journal) for their coverage of this, which I am certain will be to the effect that “po ole John is being persecuted”. Why have Mr. Pope and his friends not helped Tedesco? Oh, and BTW, where is all this concern for the children of Wake County public schools–on hold for now? Y’all keep up your resegregation of Wake, heah?

  32. corruptcarolina
    January 21, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    I am glad he has problems too because he sure made a lot of trouble for the community

  33. Fra
    January 25, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    This has everything to do with the guy – he’s broke, jobless and nearly homeless. If he loses his home – he should lose his board position since he’ll officially not really live in that district.

    This does show that Art Pope isn’t looking out for his people on the board. Why doesn’t Art hire John for a fake consultant job at one of his astroturf groups like Americans for Patriotic American Wealthy Money Pots Against Taxes?

    The sad thought is that John refuses to at least earn a little cash by being a substitute teacher in the Wake County School System. That’s what they always push at the unemployment office. Let’s see how John does filling in at schools around the county instead of just mouthing off about what he sees on his fact finding tours. Think he can handle Special Ed without an assistant (since they’re getting cut with the next round of budget slashes)?

  34. Trey M.
    January 26, 2011 at 10:38 am

    He hates poor people. I hope he ends up homeless so he can experience the challenges of being poor first hand. I hate him because he and the fearsome foursome are clearly trying to marginalize minorities and poor people. Anyone that denies that reality is psychotic. By the way, I am not a liberal….voted for both Bush I and II. It’s just that growing up poor, I know that poverty can limit you. Exposure to people who were different than me, helped me transcend poverty. If John T. has his way, a smart and capable kid in a poor community will not have that exposure.

  35. dems4life
    February 7, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    These comments are shameful. If you people only knew the truth, I think many of you would be shocked. Trey M comments of “he hates poor people” and “I hope he ends up homeless” and the ever lovely “I hate him” are absolutely despicable comments. I have known John since he was a little boy and what everyone with an opinion and no facts fails to realize is John was dirt poor, DIRT POOR. Family of 8 raised on a steelworkers salary of 22k and his mother was drug addict. (add that expense into your equations). Also he didn’t quit, BBBS fired him because of the bad publicity they were receiving after they supported him pre-election just like every voter fully knowing what he was running for. They gave him a few months’ pay to write that resignation letter and try to spin positive for them. He is in this situation for 1 reason and 1 reason only. He tried to help our children. Oh and FYI to everyone who says his finances are relative to his position. His FICO score before being elected was 820.