Conservative plan: Replace public campaign financing with Pope campaign financing?

(Cross-posted from Facing South)

By Chris Kromm

Perhaps more than any other North Carolina politician, Sen. Jim Davis owes his place in the state legislature to Republican millionaire donor Art Pope.

And now, Davis is the lead sponsor of a bill that Pope and his network of conservative groups have made a top priority this year: to dismantle the state’s system of publicly-financed, “clean” elections — a reform aimed at lessening the influence of outside money in politics.

In a year of record-shattering spending for state-level elections, about 75 percent of the outside, non-party money in North Carolina’s 2010 races was funneled through three groups backed by Art Pope: Americans for Prosperity, Civitas Action and Real Jobs NC.

The impact of Pope-connected money was especially clear in Davis’ state senate race last fall. Civitas Action and Real Jobs NC unleashed $265,000 worth of attack ads against moderate incumbent Sen. John Snow, one of the biggest races targeted by the groups and a staggering sum for the small Senate 50 mountain district.

That was on top of the more than $530,000 in money given directly to Davis’ campaign — including $16,000 given by Art Pope and three other Pope family members, according to campaign finance records.

The flood of outside money may well have tipped the race: Davis, a newcomer to state politics, won by just 161 votes.


Now Sen. Davis appears to be returning the favor. The freshman lawmaker has introduced SB 419, a bill that would abolish North Carolina’s system of public financing for certain state races.

Davis’ bill includes a provision that limits contributions that individuals could make directly to a party and candidate to $250,000. But it leaves untouched spending by outside groups like those backed by Pope in 2010, which have grown in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision which loosened rules on corporate giving to independent outfits that get involved in elections.

The “clean elections” laws, like those in a handful of other states, were passed to give candidates an alternative to relying on outside special interest money; candidates for select judicial and Council of State races are eligible if they raise a specified amount from small donors.

The program has proved popular: 77 percent of eligible judges [pdf] have used public matching funds, as did both the Democratic and Republican candidates for state insurance commissioner in 2008.

However, the reforms have long been opposed by big Republican donors like Pope and conservative groups in North Carolina, who call them a waste of taxpayer money. This year, the John Locke Foundation, John W. Pope Civitas Institute and Americans for Prosperity have all made it a top priority to kill the program.

But North Carolina’s conservative groups are far from disinterested observers in the debate over money in politics. As Facing South and the Institute have documented, the Civitas Institute and Locke Foundation receive more than 80 percent of their funding from Art Pope’s family foundation; in the case of Civitas, it’s 97 percent. Pope also sits on the board of both organizations.

It’s not hard to see why Sen. Davis and his allies would prefer Pope-funded elections to publicly-supported ones.


  1. frances

    April 14, 2011 at 3:07 pm

    Now, where did Marc Basnight get all of his money to fund Democrat candidates? Where did Jim Black or Mike Easley get their money.? Is this different? Is this where employees made $4,000.00 contributions making $8.00 per hour to the Democrat Party of Perdue?. Do the Democrats perfer back door funding of an election? This is different because it is Republicans rather than Democrats, how?

  2. Rob Schofield

    April 14, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    You really need to start paying attention. We’ve been attacking corrupt campaign fundraising practices for years and years.

  3. frances

    April 14, 2011 at 6:05 pm

    Really, you seem to always to give Perdue a pass. She is corrupt but you always seem to find a way to support her. You allow her to use the poor, teachers and children to promote her agenda. When politicians use Jesus, children and the elderly, I want to run. We have more poverty in NC than any time in the history of the state. That was not created in one hundred days. If Art Pope gave every dime he had, he could never reach the heights of Democrat corruption in NC.

  4. Dallas Woodhouse

    April 15, 2011 at 12:19 am

    Rob and Chris:

    Thanks for offering me the chance to respond to the facing south article because there is no way to do so. Ulnlike the two of you, Chris Kromm is simply a democrat hack that does not like debate. He only wants to distort and mistate the facts.

    Americans for Prosperity did spend money to educate voters about forced taxpayer funding of political speech. Civitas action did this as well. We believe this is wrong.

    I have e-mailed, called and emplore people like Bob Hall, Bob Phillips, Damon, Kromm, and others to stop repeating a lie.

    Let me state one fact.

    AFP and/or Civitas Action DID NOT engage in express advocacy. Tha means we never sent an email, bought radio/tv, or sent direct mail that asked/told people who to vote for or against.

    Citizens United ONLY changed the rules with groups that do express advocacy.

    You may hate the use of our free speech rights, but everything we did was LEGAL before citizens united.

    You still may hate our use of our rights.

    But when it comes to campaign financing laws details to matter, and I ask that before you attack us, you get the facts straight.

    Have a nice day.

  5. Dallas Woodhouse

    April 15, 2011 at 12:24 am

    Oops, I caught a couple of spellllinnnnn errrorrsssss

    My point is, I am tired of this lie that citizens united allowed us to do what we did in 2010.

    It is not true.

    Facts matter.

Check Also

As Senate Judiciary committee prepares to approve Barrett, advocates call on Tillis and Burr to reconsider

It appears that U.S. Senate Republicans will take ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

WASHINGTON — After the Republican National Convention pulled out of Charlotte earlier this year due [...]

[Editor's note: As a part of an ongoing effort to help North Carolina voters become better info [...]

The number of uninsured children in America increased by 726,000 between 2016 and 2019, reversing a [...]

Land ownership records, experiences elsewhere raise big questions as to where benefits from controve [...]

If the Trump Administration and a group of 18 states convince the Supreme Court to strike down the A [...]

In the 16 years I’ve lived in this exact spot, I’ve been no stranger to disaster. It’s been two year [...]

It’s been seven months since the COVID-19 pandemic turned life upside down in North Carolina, but it [...]

[Editor’s note: The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on President Trump’s nomination o [...]