Uncategorized

Back to 1787?

One thing you can say for sure about state Senator David Rouzer of Johnston County is that the man appears to have a thing for amending the Constitution. Last week, he introduced THREE separate bills calling for constitutional conventions – not state constitutional conventions mind you, but federal constitutional conventions; as in the Big Kahuna – all of the United States coming together to work on the The Big Document. Senator Andrew Brock added his name to two of them.

Senate Bill 634 is entitled “AN ACT APPLYING TO CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION FOR PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES PERMITTING REPEAL OF ANY FEDERAL LAW OR REGULATION BY VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE STATE LEGISLATURES.”

I guess you might call that the modern “nullification” law.

Senate Bill 637 is entitled “AN ACT APPLYING TO CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION FOR PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES THAT CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW THAT APPLIES TO THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES THAT DOES NOT APPLY EQUALLY TO THE SENATORS OR REPRESENTATIVES AND CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW THAT APPLIES TO THE SENATORS OR REPRESENTATIVES THAT DOES NOT APPLY EQUALLY TO THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES.”

Well. That’s one way to raise everyone’s salary.

Then, there was this one (Senate Bill 680): “AN ACT APPLYING TO CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION FOR PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES TO PRESERVE THE ENERGY SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY BY INCREASING DOMESTIC HYDROCARBON PRODUCTION BY DIRECTING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO OPEN UP ALL FEDERAL ONSHORE AND OFFSHORE LANDS FOR ENERGY EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION IF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DATA INDICATES THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF ECONOMICALLY RECOVERABLE HYDROCARBON RESOURCES.”

Maybe we can call that the Exxon/BP amendment.
 


One Comment


  1. JeffS

    April 25, 2011 at 11:29 am

    Most of Mr Rouzer’s sponsored bills appear to have been handed to him from one industry lobbyist or another.

    The others make him appear to be somewhat of a nut. I wonder if he has chosen to decline the benefits his office affords to him, but not the rest of us?

    Equality for legislators, but not police? SB664 would require “just cause” to fire a police officer. What about the rest of us David? Will we get equal protection? I’ll even write the bill for you. Just let me know who to make the check out to.

Check Also

Editorial rightfully asks us to remember the MLK that wasn’t widely popular in his time

It’s King Day. Today, January 15, would have ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

449,235 - Total undergrad enrollment in North Carolina 19,767 - Total for-profit undergrad enrollmen [...]

There’s a new rumor afoot about judicial reform that lawmakers may try to pass a judicial appointmen [...]

The head of North Carolina’s controversial charter takeover program says there’s no guarantee he’ll [...]

UNC Board of Governors Chairman Louis Bissette began the new year by penning a column urging his own [...]

Grand constitutional questions in this country aren’t settled until the Supreme Court has its say, e [...]

The post Gerrymander struck down appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

This past week has been a good one for the state of Alabama. Not only did the Crimson Tide football [...]

Conservative North Carolina lawmakers have pushed through a lot of radical laws and legislative prop [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more