Poverty and Policy Matters, Uncategorized

Measuring Economic Hardship

The release of the Census Bureau data each year brings attention to a particular measure of economic hardship–the official or federal poverty line.  And while it is certainly staggering that more than 17 percent of North Carolinians are earning less than $22,314 for a family of four, and more than 728,000 North Carolinians had half that income in 2010, there is a general consensus that the poverty line does not capture the full scope of economic hardship. Thus, the number of folks facing challenges in getting by is likely much greater.

The Federal Poverty Level (FPL) was designed in the 1960s to determine the minimum income necessary for a family to survive, not to be economically secure. Most notably, the FPL is based only on the cost of food and assumes that cost accounts for one-third of family expenses, ignores expenses that are significant today but were not common in 1960, like child care, was designed to measure after-tax income but today is applied to pre-tax income, thereby inaccurately portraying the amount of money a family actually has available to spend. It also is the same across the nation and does not take into account cost-of-living variations.

Better measures of the full scope of economic hardship are needed. The North Carolina Budget and Tax Center released its 2010 Living Income Standard this summer, a market-based estimate of what it takes for a working family with children to pay for basic expenses.  One key finding of that report is that the average North Carolina family of two adults and two children would need $48,814, an amount equal to 221 percent of the federal poverty line, to make ends meet.  However, the Living Income Standard also provides county specific estimates due to the geographic variation in costs and opportunity.

The Census data released last week suggest that at least 1 in 3 North Carolinians do not earn a living income. Such a closer estimate of economic hardship demonstrates the truly staggering challenges facing North Carolina but can also better inform solutions.

 

 

3 Comments


  1. Eunice

    September 28, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    Obama is sending us all to the poor house. Another four years of his “leadership”, and we won’t even recognize this country ! It will be Third World.

  2. Occupy Charlotte

    September 29, 2011 at 9:54 am

    thanks for sharing.

  3. […] translates to 1 in 4 African Americans and 1 in 3 Latinos in the state who are living under the federal poverty level. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007 and […]

Check Also

Some simple NC tax code changes that could improve children’s lives

North Carolina is underinvesting in the programs and ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The political compromise that repealed HB2 was enough for the NCAA and ACC, both of which have retur [...]

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

North Carolina’s largest public school system may be warning of “enormous disruptions” without speed [...]

Carol Turner hadn’t lived in North Carolina long before last November’s election. A retired nurse, s [...]

How many times do we have to say it? Well, it’s worth repeating – especially in the aftermath of rec [...]

As the national pundits weigh in on President Trump’s first 100 days in office and the General Assem [...]

How the General Assembly is spending “crossover week” and what it ought to be doing The last week of [...]

To casual observers, the recent controversy surrounding public school class-size mandates in grades [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more