Poverty and Policy Matters, Uncategorized

Measuring Economic Hardship

The release of the Census Bureau data each year brings attention to a particular measure of economic hardship–the official or federal poverty line.  And while it is certainly staggering that more than 17 percent of North Carolinians are earning less than $22,314 for a family of four, and more than 728,000 North Carolinians had half that income in 2010, there is a general consensus that the poverty line does not capture the full scope of economic hardship. Thus, the number of folks facing challenges in getting by is likely much greater.

The Federal Poverty Level (FPL) was designed in the 1960s to determine the minimum income necessary for a family to survive, not to be economically secure. Most notably, the FPL is based only on the cost of food and assumes that cost accounts for one-third of family expenses, ignores expenses that are significant today but were not common in 1960, like child care, was designed to measure after-tax income but today is applied to pre-tax income, thereby inaccurately portraying the amount of money a family actually has available to spend. It also is the same across the nation and does not take into account cost-of-living variations.

Better measures of the full scope of economic hardship are needed. The North Carolina Budget and Tax Center released its 2010 Living Income Standard this summer, a market-based estimate of what it takes for a working family with children to pay for basic expenses.  One key finding of that report is that the average North Carolina family of two adults and two children would need $48,814, an amount equal to 221 percent of the federal poverty line, to make ends meet.  However, the Living Income Standard also provides county specific estimates due to the geographic variation in costs and opportunity.

The Census data released last week suggest that at least 1 in 3 North Carolinians do not earn a living income. Such a closer estimate of economic hardship demonstrates the truly staggering challenges facing North Carolina but can also better inform solutions.

 

 

3 Comments


  1. Eunice

    September 28, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    Obama is sending us all to the poor house. Another four years of his “leadership”, and we won’t even recognize this country ! It will be Third World.

  2. Occupy Charlotte

    September 29, 2011 at 9:54 am

    thanks for sharing.

  3. […] translates to 1 in 4 African Americans and 1 in 3 Latinos in the state who are living under the federal poverty level. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007 and […]

Check Also

Job announcements still fall short of 16,000 new jobs needed every month in N.C. to get back to pre-Recession levels

The North Carolina GOP released a press release ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement refuses to disclose any details of probe into alle [...]

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

Here is something you probably haven’t heard much lately, if at all, given the shocking news from Ch [...]

Lawmakers to return to Raleigh yet again; agenda may include dangerous “de-reg” proposal The North C [...]

The three federal judges could have just come right out and said it: The Republicans who rule the N. [...]

3---number of states that adopted new state Earned Income Tax Credits in 2017---Montana, Hawaii, and [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more