Uncategorized

Why a Second Corporate Tax Amnesty Would be Even Worse than the First

Ezra Klein had a great write-up yesterday on why, when one hears the term “repatriation holiday” to describe the proposal put forth by Senators Hagan and McCain, what one should be hearing is  “massive corporate-tax break that will have terrible long-term consequences.”

Independent economic studies of the 2004 tax amnesty for corporate profits parked overseas have shown it to be an abject failure that delivered none of the promised benefits.  What Klein does is put in simple terms why a second corporate tax amnesty would be even worse than the first:

But the real problem, they say, will come if we offer another holiday just six years after the first. If you keep offering these repatriation holidays, what begins to happen is that they’re not viewed as one-time offers but periodic sales. In that world, corporations will simply wait for a holiday before they bring income home. That means they stop bringing money home in non-holiday years, and so that money goes effectively untaxed.

As an analogy, imagine that individuals didn’t have to pay taxes in any given year, but only had to pay them eventually. And now imagine that every 10 years or so, Congress passed a massive tax cut for individuals who chose to pay taxes in that particular year. Everyone would just wait to pay taxes in those years, and the real tax rate in this country would plummet, even if we never cut taxes permanently.

That’s why it’s so critical that Congress not fall for the false promises of the corporate lobbyists pushing hard for a second corporate tax amnesty.

Instead, Congressional leaders should eliminate the corporate tax rules that create incentives for multinational corporations to invest and shift profits overseas in the first place.  Chief among those policy changes would be ending the practice of allowing corporations to indefinitely defer paying corporate taxes on profits parked overseas.  Making this move toward a “pure worldwide” corporate tax system would eliminate the perverse incentives in our tax code that reward companies for shifting investment and profits overseas, and it would do so without sacrificing billions in federal revenues.

 

One Comment


  1. […] job growth — much weaker now than in 2004-05, Americans should be even more skeptical that a second corporate tax amnesty in less than a decade would do anything to create jobs for anyone who’s not a corporate tax […]

Check Also

Some of Obama Administration’s Proposed Tax Changes Lay Groundwork for Federal, State Reform

This blog post is one in a series ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

On a cozy autumn evening at the luxurious Umstead Hotel in Cary, a medley of corporate luminaries, s [...]

A fix for North Carolina’s class size crisis in March? A GOP senator from Wake County tells his cons [...]

Back in September, the N.C. Historical Commission put off a decision on removing three Confederate m [...]

449,235 - Total undergrad enrollment in North Carolina 19,767 - Total for-profit undergrad enrollmen [...]

Mounting student debt is a nagging problem for most families these days. As the cost of higher educa [...]

Latest racist attacks on immigrants could be an important tipping point As bleak as our national pol [...]

Grand constitutional questions in this country aren’t settled until the Supreme Court has its say, e [...]

The post Gerrymander struck down appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more