Uncategorized

Debunking a myth about the Racial Justice Act

As this morning’s essay by former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Burley Mitchell and his law partner Press Millen makes clear yet again, the notion that the Racial Justice Act will somehow set murderers free as is claimed by conservative opponents of the law is, in a word, poppycock.

“The greatest misapprehension concerning the act is that death row inmates who successfully challenge their sentences could go free. This is simply not true. The act only undoes the death penalty, stating that no person shall be executed based on a “judgment that was sought or obtained on the basis of race.” Under the act’s hearing procedure, if a defendant establishes that race was a significant factor in the imposition of his death sentence, the court is directed to vacate that death sentence and resentence the death row inmate to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.”

Moreover, the argument that law would somehow turn loose convicted murderers who were originally sentenced to death prior to the time the state had the possibility of life in prison without parole is equally specious.

“This argument is without legal merit for at least two reasons. First, it overlooks the entirely ameliorative effect of the act which gives those sentenced to death the chance at a less onerous sentence, namely life without parole. As the U.S. Supreme Court has put it, the death penalty is “is qualitatively different from a sentence of imprisonment, however long” and “unique in its total irrevocability.” Under the act, then, the only alternative punishment the inmate can suffer is a punishment less than execution.

Second, any inmate who raises a claim under the law necessarily waives any ex post facto claim. No inmate can claim the benefits of the act by electing to participate in the process while at the same time challenging the sole relief provided in the act. Tellingly, no inmate who has brought a claim under the act has claimed entitlement to a life sentence with parole.”

In other words, Mitchell and Milen provide more compelling evidence that Racial Justice Act opponents are simply playing politics in a cynical effort to gin up unwarranted fears of an eventuality that simply isn’t going  to come to pass. But then, what else is new with the state’s right-wing politicos?

Check Also

BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court upholds decision striking down NC congressional map

Here’s the interesting headline from Supreme Court watcher ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Wednesday was the 63rd anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, the milestone U.S. Sup [...]

A Q&A with key players ahead of today’s House vote House lawmakers are expected to vote today on [...]

The North Carolina Senate is expected to give final approval to its proposed 2017-19 state budget so [...]

The post Crumbs appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In the past few months, North Carolinians have seen our General Assembly make national news several [...]

The last week has featured some of the most offensive, belligerent, and vindictive behavior by elect [...]

Hurricane Matthew non-response sets a new low when it comes to basics of governing With the increasi [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more