Talking sense about the contraceptives debate
As is so often the case. Linda Greenhouse of the NYT explains and makes sense of the newly manufactured (and obviosuly politically-motivated) debate over contraceptive coverage.
“Permitting Catholic hospitals to withhold contraception coverage from their 765,000 employees would blow a gaping hole in the regulation. The 629-hospital Catholic health care system is a major and respected health care provider, serving one in every six hospital patients and employing nearly 14 percent of all hospital staff in the country. Of the top 10 revenue-producing hospital systems in 2010, four were Catholic. The San Francisco-based Catholic Healthcare West, the fifth biggest hospital system in the country, had $11 billion in revenue last year and treated 6.2 million patients.
These institutions, as well as Catholic universities – not seminaries, but colleges and universities whose doors are open to all – are full participants in the public square, receiving a steady stream of federal dollars. They assert – indeed, have earned – the right to the same benefits that flow to their secular peers. What they now claim is a right to special treatment: to conscience that trumps law.”
You can read her entire informative piece by clicking here.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged contraception, Reproductive rights, Supreme Court. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments (Closed):5