Uncategorized

$1,000 a plate to hear lawmaker “obfuscate”?

Sorry I didn’t do a better job of making that headline rhyme — maybe you have a suggestion.

Here are the amazing/amusing facts that gave rise to it:

House Majority Leader Rep. Paul Stam is holding a fundraiser and the subject is voter suppression (aka mandatory voter photo I.D.). Now guess who the featured speaker is?

Why none other that the chair of the House committee that has presided over various efforts to limit voter turnout amongst groups of people disfavored by the far right, Rep. David Lewis.

If the name isn’t ringing any bells, Lewis is the same person Stam referred to in the now infamous, acidentally-recorded House Republican caucus from last year as someone who can “obfuscate more than anybody I know.”

Sounds like a pretty typical Stam event.

 

 

5 Comments


  1. jlp75

    February 20, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    $1000 a plate, ladened with hate

  2. Frances Jenkins

    February 20, 2012 at 7:44 pm

    To be really honest, there are different prices to attend this event. This is just yellow journalism at its best.

  3. jlp75

    February 20, 2012 at 8:11 pm

    Well if it were the last meal on the planet, I would opt for starvation.

  4. david esmay

    February 20, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    The Republican’s champion prevaricator displaying his abilities, why that’s priceless.

  5. Joyce McCloy

    February 21, 2012 at 12:08 am

    I emailed Rep Lewis last year about the photo ID bill. The Greensboro News and Record published an excerpt of the email exchange on April 19, 2011. It is still pertinent today. Basically all the photo ID law does is make it harder for poor people to vote, and doesn’t prevent “voter fraud”.
    Snip:
    Is that ID on the up and up?
    ….
    The bill does not address the issue of “fake” IDs, specify a verification process by the election official, or require other agencies to share databases for verification of IDs. So Ms. McCloy is correct that the bill does not include a system or funding for verification of the IDs,
    and as a result the remaining questions (computer system for ID verification, electronic pollbooks , cost of such a system, security, etc.) are not addressed in the bill.
    ….
    Obviously the verification process is going to be highly subjective and predicated on the suspicion that you’re not entitled to vote unless you can prove otherwise.
    http://www.news-record.com/blog/54431/entry/116116

Check Also

Editorial: A “train wreck” of a state budget

The lead editorial in the Fayetteville Observer tells ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The $23 billion budget deal speeding through the N.C. General Assembly this week includes a platoon [...]

Royal Diadem Jewelers in Greensboro sets itself apart in a number of small ways - fast and friendly [...]

Over one weekend last October, more than a half-foot of rain fell on the small town of Vass in Moore [...]

The North Carolina Court of Appeals celebrates its 50th anniversary this year. As the court heads in [...]

The final budget that lawmakers have proposed fails to strengthen the foundation of North Carolina’s [...]

Most of the initial headlines about the final budget agreement announced Monday afternoon by legisla [...]

Unexplained, backroom maneuver would rob already underfunded anti-poverty program There’s no denying [...]

Women and their access to health care has been in the news these past few months, as the plan to rep [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more