Big business weighs in against the marriage discrimination amendment

The national public policy outlet Stateline Daily has a story on same-sex marriage today that features the debate in North Carolina. According to the report, big businesses are weighing in increasing numbers throughout the country in favor of marriage equality and against proposals like North Carolina’s controversial Amendment One.

The article begins with a case study from Washington state — a place where business support was critical in getting same sex marriage approved. It goes on to note:

“Support from businesses has also been important in other states that have debated gay marriage, including New York, which voted to legalize it in 2011, and Maryland, which, like Washington State, legalized gay marriage in February but faces a referendum effort to put the issue before voters.

The driving force behind business involvement has less to do with the money that gay people might spend in the state than with workforce concerns. As more states move toward legalizing gay marriage, more businesses fear being left behind in places seen as backward by gay workers and other young employees who feel strongly about the issue.

‘If you’re sending a signal to the world that you’re biased, it doesn’t just scare away gay people,’ says Stephen Dull, vice president for strategy and innovation at the North Carolina-based VF Corporation, a Fortune 500 company. ‘It scares away everyone.'”

The article goes on to quote Dull for the proposition that the amendment will, if passed, make it harder to recruit smart people to our state:

“North Carolina voters will consider on May 8 whether to put the state’s existing ban on gay marriage in the state constitution. If that happens, Dull says, it will be even tougher than it already is to recruit the mobile, metropolitan, high-level employees the company is looking to attract for its Greensboro headquarters. VF is the parent company to a host of high-profile fashion brands, including The North Face, Nautica, Lee and Lucy. VF has not taken a public stand in favor of gay marriage, but many of its employees have.

Dull says he already has to reassure many of his potential recruits that they wouldn’t be moving to a place that is straight out of the rural South of a generation ago. ‘If this were going on when I was recruited, I don’t think I could have joined,’ says Dull. ‘It’s not that we’re trying to recruit gay talent, but people see it as a sign of how welcome their ideas will be, no matter how different. And that’s important for innovation.’”

Click here to read the entire article.


  1. Nonanon

    March 20, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    Of course businesses don’t won’t to alienate even 2 – 4% of their work force and see it in their business interest to accommodate all. Business and societies interests do not always align, as in this case.

    Why redefine marriage after tens of thousands of years of human civilization as anything other than between one man and one woman?

    Regardless of what the herd is doing.

  2. Jeremy

    March 20, 2012 at 2:50 pm

    Writing discrimination into our state constitution doesn’t advance our society’s interests. It only advances Nonanon’s narrow, bigoted agenda. I’m sure there were others asking his/her same ridiculous question when the Supreme Court forced states to redefine marriage to include blacks and whites marrying each other.

  3. HunterC

    March 20, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    I’m guess the ignorant don’t recognize that marriage has changed not only since Loving v. Virginia, but also since Solomon had his wives and concubines.

    Still the amendment would ban civil unions which the usual anti-gay crowd is now clamoring for in New Hampshire this week.

    Seems to be a state-by-state acceptance of different levels of bigotry. Very situational ethics for the anti-progress folks.

    Keep telling everyone, vote AGAINST on May 8.

  4. david esmay

    March 20, 2012 at 5:32 pm

    @nonanon. We don’t live in a simple frontier or medieval society. Our society is not the same as it was, 25, 50, or 100 years ago. Writing bigotry into our state constitution will not turn back the clock for you or any other bigoted person. We all need to evolve, as our society evolves, and the constitution needs to evolve with us. Conservatives are all the same, making the same old tired arguements about undoing, tearing down, destroying and going backwards with every breath. Never do they speak of building or looking forward.

Check Also

Veteran NC business attorney pens open letter to Sen. Tillis over child detention crisis

Press Millen is a veteran North Carolina business ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With midterm elections around the corner, lawmakers have, unsurprisingly, taken aim at last minute c [...]

On May 25, the news headlines read that Democratic state Senate candidate Jen Mangrum had been disqu [...]

If it seemed impossible that neighbors of industrialized hog farms had any legal rights left to lose [...]

Can you put a price tag on victims' rights? A fiscal note obtained by NC Policy Watch that has [...]

The post SB 711 – The pig’s roast appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In another effort to pander to the minority of Americans who want to make abortion and birth control [...]

The practice of loading down noncontroversial legislation with divisive and partisan provisions is a [...]

It usually happens a few times every legislative session: at some point during their annual stay in [...]