Uncategorized

“No” to eugenics compensation? Really??!!

Good lord. Do these people hear what they’re saying? According to news reports, several members of the House Judiciary Committee — including Rep. George “There is no extreme poverty in North Carolina” Cleveland — actually opposed a bill to provide compensation to eugenics victims when it came up for a vote in committee yesterday.

According to Raleigh’s News & Observer, Cleveland said that taxpayers should not have to pay for wrongs committed in the past. Wow! One has to wonder just how far Cleveland would be willing to extend that “logic.”

Committee votes are not recorded so it will be interesting to see if the conservative opponents of compensation are willing to actually vote “no” and do it  “on the record”  when the measure comes to the House floor for a vote.

4 Comments


  1. Jack

    May 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    Government can destroy lives and not in any way be held responsible?

    This is the government of the now in NC. The NCGA has acted and will continue to act in the best interest of entities rather than the interest of the people of which it is so dismissive.

    Eugenics was a state program designed to harm its citizens. Mr. Cleveland and others in the NCGA who support his statement need to think about that and come to an understanding as to what it means to deliberately harm citizens.

  2. Alex

    May 23, 2012 at 2:24 pm

    When did we start paying for government incompetence ? I doubt we have enough money to go down that path !

  3. Jack

    May 23, 2012 at 3:09 pm

    It would be one thing if NC government had simply been incompetent but NC government deliberately harmed it citizens with malice aforethought. The motivation behind the state’s eugenics program was money. Destroy a life and save a dollar. Such a program is not incompetence but inhumane treatment of a state toward its citizens.

    Conservatives say that people need to take responsibility their actions. Is the state any less accountable to the people when the people are the target of such brutality?

  4. Frank Burns

    May 24, 2012 at 5:44 am

    Yes this was a brutal program, but the activists claimed it was humane. This program is the result of an activist govenment. A department is started and it expands to a state eugenic program. This is why we have to continually guard against government activism, monitor program effectiveness and stop excessive intrusion in our lives. Our government has done bad things in the past and is continuing to do bad things. We should keep our focus on the present poor deeds of our government like the activist EPA.

Check Also

Cooper continues winning streak against legislators; Judges grant TRO

In case you missed it earlier this evening, ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With just a few hours left until the crossover deadline, the state of North Carolina’s environment i [...]

On Monday morning, there was only one way left to save the Court of Appeals and a few hours with whi [...]

The political compromise that repealed HB2 was enough for the NCAA and ACC, both of which have retur [...]

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

How many times do we have to say it? Well, it’s worth repeating – especially in the aftermath of rec [...]

As the national pundits weigh in on President Trump’s first 100 days in office and the General Assem [...]

How the General Assembly is spending “crossover week” and what it ought to be doing The last week of [...]

To casual observers, the recent controversy surrounding public school class-size mandates in grades [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more