Health advocates urge Senate to fully fund prevention programs

With legislators on the fast track to finish-up their work and leave Raleigh, health advocates are appealing to budget-writers to fully fund more than $17 million worth of tobacco prevention programs in recurring funds.

Here’s the request from the North Carolina Alliance for Health to members of the Senate HHS Appropriations Committee:

On behalf of the members and partners of the NC Alliance for Health, we want to share with you the improvements we believe must be made to the House’s version of budget adjustments for 2013 (HB 950) to maintain the state’s very effective and successful tobacco prevention and cessation programs. These programs have resulted in the state’s LOWEST EVER youth tobacco use rates and in more than 62,000 FEWER high school aged smokers in the state (see attached from Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids) since funding for the programs began nearly 10 years ago.

To maintain the state’s tobacco prevention and cessation programs at current levels, we ask that the Senate:

1)      FULLY fund tobacco prevention and cessation programs at the current level of $17.3 million and to make these funds RECURRING. The House budget proposes $5.4 million in dedicated funding to tobacco prevention programs restricted to ages kindergarten through 12th grade. This amounts to an $11.9 million or 68% cut to these programs. A cut of this magnitude will decimate the programs – they will not be what they were, will not cover the number of youth across the state as they did and will certainly lead to an increase in youth smoking rates (see info below). In addition, restricting the use of these funds to kindergarten through 12th grade completely leaves out prevention services for 18 – 24 year olds which have the highest smoking rate in the state.
2)      Make any funds provided to tobacco prevention and cessation programs RECURRING funds. Without recurring dollars, the infrastructure of these programs will crumble and have to be rebuilt each year after experienced employees leave their positions given the uncertainty of the budget process. The exodus has already begun for many of these programs. Given that the state has RECURRING Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) dollars to pay for these programs (which will come to the state as long as the tobacco industry remains in business), there is no excuse for these programs NOT to have RECURRING dollars in the budget. The state received $141 million in MSA dollars in April, 2012 – and we are asking for just $17.3 million of these funds to be used on tobacco prevention and cessation programs.

3)      Remove a special provision put in place by the House that explicitly prohibits the expenditure of funds on media and marketing. As currently written, this special provision will result in the END of the nationally recognized TRU media campaign which has been one of the signature successes of the programs. These ads have been noted by youth in numerous surveys as being very effective in keeping youth from starting to smoke, and they have been replicated by the CDC for use in other states.

4)      Finally, the House budget includes no DEDICATED funding for the QuitlineNC. By amendment of the House Appropriations Committee, the QuitlineNC was added to the list of possible expenditures for the $5.4 million dedicated for tobacco prevention. However, this year the state spent $1.9 million to run the Quitline at current call volume levels – and NC saw the HIGHEST CALL VOLUME IN NORTH AMERICA since the beginning of 2012 (see attached chart). We ask that the Senate make the QuitlineNC a dedicated line item of $1.9 million in recurring funds to maintain current service levels which are seeing the highest demand in history.

Over the nearly 10 years these programs have been in place (with the inception of the Health and Wellness Trust Fund), dedicated tobacco prevention and cessation funds have helped 7,000 North Carolinians quit via QuitineNC and have reduced future healthcare costs by $7.2 billion (see attached document).

According to the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, if tobacco prevention funding is cut to $5.4 million this year (currently at $17.3 million annually), NC will see:

*   An increase in youth smoking rates of 1.9%;
*   10,590 more kids growing up to become addicted adult smokers;
*   3,800 more kids growing up to die prematurely from smoking;
*   Future healthcare expenditures in the state will increase by $185.3 million. State Medicaid healthcare spending ALONE will increase by $19.6 million.

Please consider the effectiveness and value of these programs as you make your budget priorities for 2013. Bottom line – keeping youth from starting to smoke saves the state and save us all health care costs in the long run. Please FULLY fund these programs with RECURRING funds.


  1. […] NCGA – Don’t cut anti-teen smoking programs Post on June 7, 2012 by Adam Searing No Comments Kristy Andrews has been featured in several TRU commercials in North Carolina.  She  lost her husband to tobacco use when he was just 30 years old.  Kristy just released a compelling video asking the North Carolina General Assembly not to make the massive cuts to tobacco prevention programs currently proposed: […]

  2. Frank Burns

    June 7, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    NC likes to tax tobacco, why don’t they leave people alone and let them smoke? I personally enjoy my daily cigar, purchased at JR’s.

  3. Ricky Leung

    June 8, 2012 at 9:48 am

    Keep smoking. You don’t have to keep it at just 1 cigar. Smoke more! Just keep it confined to a closed room with no ventilation so it won’t expose the rest of us to your lung particles.

  4. Mark

    June 11, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    All of the funding for tobacco prevention efforts comes form the Master Settlement Agreement not state taxes. Tobacco prevention efforts have prevented 62,000 youth from starting smoking and NC residents $2.4 Billion dollars in health care cost. In these tough times, free money (MSA dollars) to save me money sounds good!

Check Also

Democracy NC: Why North Carolinians should be wary of the legislature’s vague new voter ID proposal

If you missed it over the weekend, be ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

On May 25, the news headlines read that Democratic state Senate candidate Jen Mangrum had been disqu [...]

If it seemed impossible that neighbors of industrialized hog farms had any legal rights left to lose [...]

Can you put a price tag on victims' rights? A fiscal note obtained by NC Policy Watch that has [...]

A new bill to relocate the “Silent Sam” Confederate monument on UNC’s flagship Chapel Hill campus ai [...]

The post SB 711 – The pig’s roast appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In another effort to pander to the minority of Americans who want to make abortion and birth control [...]

The practice of loading down noncontroversial legislation with divisive and partisan provisions is a [...]

It usually happens a few times every legislative session: at some point during their annual stay in [...]