NC Budget and Tax Center, Uncategorized

Senate Transportation Budget Eliminates New Starts Program, Limiting Hard-Working North Carolinians’ Mobility Choices

Do you hear that sound? It could be Charlotte’s plan for the Blue Line Extension coming to a screeching halt as a result of the Senate budget proposal for transportation, which would eliminate the Public Transportation Division’s New Starts & Regional Capital Grant Program and $29 million in state appropriations. New Starts is a grant program that allocates federal transportation resources for mass transit capital projects—such as light rail and bus rapid transit—and requires local and state matching appropriations. The proposal may cause Charlotte to lose out on $534.6 million in federal funding for the Blue Line Extension if state funds are not available to cover the required 25 percent match.

As I mentioned in this space last week, public transportation is already woefully underfunded and only makes up 3 percent of overall state appropriations, or about $90.6 million. A $29 million cut would represent nearly a one-third cut to state appropriations for public transportation. Given Senate budget writers are leaving large sums of federal money on the table, it remains to be seen why this program is on the chopping block. Perhaps Senate budget writers will use this cut as leverage when they iron out differences with House budget writers? One thing is for certain: data shows low-income North Carolinians rely on public transportation to get to work and they would likely be impacted by this cut.

Compared to the House proposal, the Senate’s proposed budget cut to public transportation is roughly 11 times larger. Where does this difference show up? This larger cut to public transportation in the Senate proposal is nearly offset by smaller cuts to highway and road maintenance compared to the House cuts. Like the House proposal, the Senate proposal would provide $45 million for the Mobility Fund but would go a step further and also appropriate $32.5 million on a non-recurring basis.

Similar to the Governor’s and House’s budget proposals, the Senate budget proposal would also cap the state’s gas tax at 37.5 cent per gallon for FY 2012-13. The tax is already expected to fall to 37.7 cents by July. The Budget and Tax Center released a report last month on the pitfalls of capping the gas tax, which would likely delay needed repairs to the state’s backlog of stressed roads and bridges. Unlike the House proposal, Senate budget writers would not require the Department of Transportation to budget under the assumption that the gas tax will be set at 35 cents for FY2013-14 through FY2106-17—a move that would ultimately restrict the department’s ability to base transportation planning on actual revenues.

Lastly, the Senate proposal would no longer charge $45 to teenagers participating in a driver education course. Instead of paying $45 for the course, teenagers will pay the $45 fee when they get their limited learner’s permit. As such, the Senate proposal would appropriate nearly $3.2 million to the Department of Public Instruction to cover the upfront costs associated with the courses. Nearly $2.1 million would come from the Commercial Leaking Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund—which receives funding from the gas tax—to cover the appropriation to DPI. While this raid change would likely give teens a longer time period to save up $45, it also points to the challenges that have been inherent in last year’s efforts to raise resources through fees.


  1. Jack

    June 11, 2012 at 11:16 pm

    As I prepare to go to the Hill Tuesday the issue to be addressed is public transportation.

    Bills are ready to be supported and acted upon for the benefit of citizens and business. A diverse and robust public transportation system represents a healthy community and region prepared for growth and serious commerce.

  2. Frank Burns

    June 12, 2012 at 6:33 am

    Hold your horses, don’t hit the panic button! If this Blue Line extension is not built, people can still ride a bus in Charlotte. Gasp.

  3. Jack

    June 12, 2012 at 8:39 am

    I’ll pass along your opinion in my comments.

  4. david esmay

    June 12, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Jack, please do not, I repeat, do not, pass along any statements made by Major Burns. Due to staff reductions based on funding cuts at the home, he has gained unlimited access to a computer terminal. The lack of close and sustained supervision has enabled him to exponentially add to the steaming pile of increasingly absurd and irrational pronouncements of right wing extremists.

  5. Frank Burns

    June 12, 2012 at 9:25 am

    The entire point of this article paints a picture of disaster if this Blue Line Extension is not built. It implies that low income citizens will be adversely impacted when this is not true. There is a funtioning bus system in Charlotte that works fine. Everybody loves a train, but nobody enjoys higher taxes particularly during this recession.

    David, your degatory remarks won’t deter me from telling the truth.

  6. Disaster?

    June 12, 2012 at 9:30 am

    The word “limiting” does not imply disaster. It merely implies that folks will have fewer options resulting from a shorter rail line. Don’t twist the author’s words. Thankfully, folks will have access to buses if they live near a bus route. No thanks to people like you, Frank, who do not support public transit in the first place!

  7. Frank Burns

    June 12, 2012 at 9:47 am

    Dear Disastor? Maybe you missed the key alarm in the article. I’ll quote it for you.

    “One thing is for certain: data shows low-income North Carolinians rely on public transportation to get to work and they would likely be impacted by this cut.”

    This statement is false. The data shows low income North Carolinians can ride the bus and do ride the bus and therefore would not be impacted at all by this cut. I have no objections to bus transportation. It works well.

Check Also

Redesigning TANF to lift more families out of poverty

The 1996 welfare law that created Temporary Assistance ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

If you only look at the unemployment rate and the stock market, you probably think most families are [...]

It’s a strikingly familiar tale in North Carolina: voters are waiting with bated breath for a court [...]

This week, five years after a federal judge struck down North Carolina’s ban on same-sex marriage, t [...]

As the proud owner of a new restaurant, Leonardo Williams surely had other things to do this past Sa [...]

The post Rep. Lewis’ divided interest appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

We’re now almost 33 months into the one of the darkest eras in American political history – a period [...]

You can’t teach an old dog new lies. Two years ago, while stumping to give huge tax breaks to multin [...]

"The struggle for gay rights is over,” the writer James Kirchick wrote in The Atlantic in June. [...]