Uncategorized

Fracking bill whisked through committee without public comment

More distasteful sausage was ground at the General Assembly this morning — this time in the House Committee on (Pillaging the) Environment. As reported in many places, the subject was fracking and the apparently irresistable move to get a law on the books legalizing the practice in North Carolina for the first time.

The committee meeting was notable and disheartening for a number of reasons —

  • the lack of genuine debate and dialogue,
  • the sponsor’s constant refrain in response to any question or criticism that it would be dealt with later, 
  • Committee Chair Rep. Ruth Samuelson’s refusal to allow any comment from the members of the public — even those who had asked ahead of time to be heard,
  • the testimony of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Deputy Director that her agency cannot possibly comply with the bill’s ambitious demands for a complex and expedited rule-making process with its present staffing,
  • the refusal of the sponsor of the bill to accept any amendment — even one offered by Rep. Verla Insko to prohibit the placement of registered lobbyists on the commissions that will oversee the industry!

But here was the main thing that really ought to make citizens of all stripes angry: This morning, state lawmakers passed an enormously complicated 30-page bill through a crtically important committee 45 minutes after it was first unveiled in its present form. (As you can see by clicking here, the current version is not even available online yet). Reports indicate that they are intent on passing it into law within the week.

This is the kind of absurd lack of process that is fast becoming the standard M.O. for the current North Carolina General Assembly and that ultimately reflects an abiding contempt for government and governing.

3 Comments


  1. david esmay

    June 13, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    Lawrence Lessig’s observations playing out before our eyes. On one hand you’ve got fracking lobbyists and the politicians they bought, and on the other hand, the public. “Thats government, just not a democracy.”

  2. Verla Insko

    June 14, 2012 at 8:14 am

    Despite objections to my amendment to keep lobbyist off the regulatory board, I discovered this issue is already covered by our ethics statutes, G.S. 120C-304(e); (e)

  3. […] One week after passing the Senate, the fracking bill (S820) made its way through the House.  The bill only had one committee stop in the House, at 8:30 Wednesday morning in the House Environment Committee, where a brand new version of the bill was revealed for the first time.  The meeting began with bill handlers Rep. Mike Stone (R-Lee) and Rep. Mitch Gillespie (R-McDowell) explaining the process the bill had been through to get to its current version.  They pointed out that the bill had been improved since it passed the Senate, and claimed that they had addressed most concerns of many of the critics of the bill.  Next, legislative staff explained each section of the 30 page bill.  After the explanation, the floor was opened for members of the committee to ask questions of the bill sponsors and staff.  One particularly interesting line of questioning came when committee members asked DENR Assistant Secretary Robin Smith about how the bill would be implemented.  When asked about the staff resources needed, Smith replied that they would need at least seven new staff positions to implement the bill.  Notably, the current bill does not appropriate any money to DENR.  When asked about how long it would take to research, draft, and adopt new rules under the current Administrative Procedures Act rulemaking process, Smith replied that it would take at least 3-4 years.  Notably, the bill gives all agencies two years to complete the task.  Although citizens were told they would have a chance to comment on the bill, and some signed up the night before and took off work to be at the committee, the committee did not take public comment on the bill during its one committee stop in the House. You can read coverage of Wednesday’s committee meeting here, here, and here. […]

Check Also

This Week’s Top Five on NC Policy Watch

1. Free speech policy, controversial conservative academic on ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The UNC Board of Governors is holding its last meeting of 2017 Friday, where the latest of its many [...]

Just south of Candler off the Pisgah Highway is a lovely piece of property on Little Piney Mountain [...]

Veteran North Carolina education policy expert Kris Nordstrom has authored a new and vitally importa [...]

When Joni Robbins, a section chief in the N.C. Department of Public Instruction, closes bidding next [...]

“All speech is free, but some speech is more free than others.” This seems to be the motto of the cu [...]

Trumpists prepare to raze another vital common good law It’s hard to keep up these days with the flo [...]

The post That’s how ‘Humbug’ is done appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

The solid citizens of Johnston County, N.C. – in a fateful quirk of geography – for several years ha [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more