Uncategorized

The deafening silence from McCrory and Dalton

As the Duke Energy fiasco continues to spread and unravel, it raises an obvious question for any major North Carolina politician seeking high office : What is your stance on this apparent rip-off that’s being perpetrated on consumers?

The two most obvious and relevant people to whom this question should be posed are Pat McCrory and Walter Dalton.

Whoever wins the gubernatorial contest between the two men this fall will have as one of his first chores the appointment of a vacant slot on the state Utilities Commission — a position that’s been left inexcusably open since last year because GOP legislative leaders didn’t want to allow a “lame duck” governor to have the appointment.

McCrory worked for Duke  Power for years and Duke boss Jim Rogers is a big Democratic fundraiser and the Co-Chair of th Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, which might be why Dalton has yet to weigh in.

Will either guy muster the courage to stand up for consumers? The answer to that question will tell us a lot about both men and, perhaps, our state’s future.

The silence so far is deafening.

7 Comments


  1. Frank Burns

    July 9, 2012 at 10:13 pm

    In the whole scheme of things what does it matter to the public who runs Duke Energy whether it’s Rogers or the old Progress guy? That’s their business and it doesn’t affect the rate payers at all.

  2. jlp75

    July 10, 2012 at 8:50 am

    Except for the fact that this was contrary to what was presented to the Utilities Commission in order to gain approval for the merger. This is deceit pure and simple. What ever happened to integrity in business? Since this is a regulated public utility it is the business of all rate payers.

  3. Frank Burns

    July 10, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    Why would the Utilities Commission care whether Rogers or the Progress guy was in charge? The public doesn’t care. I know that I don’t.

  4. jlp75

    July 10, 2012 at 3:42 pm

    Well if no one cares why lie?

  5. James

    July 10, 2012 at 3:43 pm

    No one cares whether you care or not Frank. You are irrelevant.

    The statements made by Duke to the PUC, however, were part of a formal application that included many conditions … conditions that affected the PUC’s decision on approval.

    Rogers made false statement to the PUC. Said less politely, he is a fucking liar.

  6. Alex

    July 10, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    James, can you please refrain from cursing on this site. It doesn’t make you any more believable!

  7. Jack

    July 10, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    So goes Frank Burns so goes North Carolina? Such is the arrogance of the right.

    Although I do not approve the James’ curse word I can appreciate the emphasis it provides. Kind of like an exclamation- point within a sentence.

Check Also

Anthony Scaramucci thought HB2 was “shameful”

Anthony Scaramucci, President Trump’s new communications director, was ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The 2011 state legislative maps – which have been used in three separate election cycles and six sta [...]

When the N.C. Senate elected Tom Fetzer to the UNC Board of Governors in March, it was widely seen a [...]

The 12 minutes spent on the phone with Duke Energy customer service shed no light on how — or if — c [...]

Crumbling ceilings. Failing air conditioning and heating systems. Broken down school buses. Mold inf [...]

When I began exercising regularly, I had a decision to make. Was I going to keep buying inexpensive [...]

The post ‘Phuming Phil’ appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

5---number of years since the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) was created by P [...]

Last week, the General Assembly announced which legislators will serve on the Joint Legislative Task [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more