Uncategorized

Medicaid’s “tremendous impact”

Believe it or not, I agree with Pat McCrory. Completely.

At a campaign stop on Wednesday, gubernatorial candidate Pat McCrory joined  the likes of Texas Governor Rick Perry and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal in pledging not to implement the two most important part of the Affordable Care Act: state health exchanges and the Medicaid expansion.

His reason for opposing the Medicaid expansion provision? He’s afraid it will have a “tremendous impact on our Medicaid in North Carolina.”

Yes Pat, of course it will have a tremendous impact – that’s the point.

Presumably, what Mr. McCrory meant to say was that the expansion would have a negative fiscal impact on the state, ala the claims of other Southern Republican Governors in recent days. He would, alas, be as wrong as everyone else who makes this claim.

According to a report released yesterday based on numbers from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO):

“Medicaid expansion will add very little to what states would have spent on Medicaid without health reform, while providing health coverage to 17 million more low-income adults and children. In addition, the Medicaid expansion will reduce state and local government costs for uncompensated care and other services they provide to the uninsured, which will offset at least some — and in a number of states, possibly all or more than all— of the modest increase in state Medicaid costs. Expanding Medicaid is thus a very favorable financial deal for states.

A very favorable deal indeed, considering that the additional cost to the states represents only a 2.8 percent increase in what they would have spent on Medicaid from 2014 to 2022 if the ACA had never been passed according to the CBO.

But that number only focuses on what is spent on Medicaid, not how much is saved by giving all of these people regular access to medical care.

If you take into account the overall spending of states for medical services, the extra expenditures drops to an average additional cost of 1.6 percent above current spending levels. This means that actual “extra” money that the state will have to kick in is minuscule in comparison to the level of additional funding they will receive as a result of the program.

So, when Pat McCrory says that the ACA will have a “tremendous impact” on North Carolina’s Medicaid system, he is totally, completely, 100% correct.

Now, please excuse me while I wash my mouth out with soap.

This is a cross-post from the Action NC blog.

One Comment


  1. Frank Burns

    July 13, 2012 at 5:49 pm

    The Governor’s are realizing that the expanded Medicare is a ticking time bomb when the feds quit kicking in their portion. It is not affordable. This is part of the folly of Obamacare. When Pat McCrory is elected he would be wise to not implement Medicaid Expansion in NC.

Check Also

Vouching for vouchers

Another day, another giant backward step for the ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement refuses to disclose any details of probe into alle [...]

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

Lawmakers to return to Raleigh yet again; agenda may include dangerous “de-reg” proposal The North C [...]

The three federal judges could have just come right out and said it: The Republicans who rule the N. [...]

3---number of states that adopted new state Earned Income Tax Credits in 2017---Montana, Hawaii, and [...]

The post Total Eclipse (of Democracy) appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more