Uncategorized

Fracking industry dealt setback in its battle against local control

It was one of the many great ironies associated with controversy surrounding the issue of fracking in North Carolina that so-called conservatives opposed efforts during the 2012 legislative session to include stronger protections for landowners.

As you may recall, it was mostly conservative supporters of the fracking industry who opposed efforts to include language in fracking legislation that would have made it easier for private landowners to avoid the phenomenon known as “forced pooling” (i.e. the notion that landowners can be forced to enter into leases to sell their gas rights). Mind you, many of these same people are some of the most ardent supporters of “property rights” when it comes to things like municipal annexation.

Now comes word from Pennsylvania of a battle in which the fracking industry is butting up against another traditionally conservative ideal: local control. You see, not only does the fracking industry hate the idea of local landowners having a say about their own mineral rights, they also hate the idea of local governments having a say about how the controversial drilling process will take place in their communities.

Hence, a rather remarkable new Pennsylvania law passed at the behest of the gas and oil industry this past winter (“Act 13”) that greatly restricts the rights of localities to regulate fracking. Got it? A giant industry that’s closely aligned with conservatives got a bill passed that makes sure state law trumps the locals. I guess it’s sort of like reproductive freedom for women; conservatives are against big, centralized government power, except when they’re not.

Happily, for now, the story has a promising ending (or, at least, a promising middle). Yesterday a state appeals court threw out much of the law as an improper infringement on local zoning authority. The advocates at the group Protecting Our Waters have a nice summary of the decision and a link to the court’s opinion that you can access by clicking here,   

Let’s hope the opinion and the idea it represents — namely, that the oil and gas industry cannot simply do whatever it wants when and wherever it wants — survives the expected appeal and spreads south to North Carolina ASAP.   

 

Check Also

The best editorial of the weekend

There have been a lot of editorials lamenting ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

A pivotal legislative task force may be just beginning its dive into North Carolina’s school funding [...]

The controversy over “Silent Sam,” the Confederate monument on UNC’s Chapel Hill campus, has been ra [...]

North Carolina tries to mine its swine and deal with a poop problem that keeps piling up A blanket o [...]

This story is part of "Peak Pig," an examination of the hog industry co-published with Env [...]

Five years ago, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a jaw-dropping civil rights lawsuit again [...]

Will Burr and Tillis really vote for this? For much of the 20th Century, one of the labels that Amer [...]

President Trump and Congressional Republicans aim to rebrand enormous tax cuts for the wealthiest ho [...]

20—number of years since a bipartisan coalition in Congress passed the Children’s Health Insurance P [...]

Spotlight on Journalism

We invite you to join a special celebration of investigative journalism! The evening will feature Mike Rezendes, a member of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Boston Globe Spotlight Team known for their coverage of the cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church.

Tickets available NOW!

Spotlight On Journalism

This event will benefit NC Policy Watch, a project of the North Carolina Justice Center. Sponsorship opportunities available now!

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more