Uncategorized

Perdue punts on Asheville water bill

It seems like a safe bet that every Governor given the option probably uses it, but there’s something enormously frustrating about Governor Perdue’s penchant for simply taking no action at all on bills sent to her by the General Assembly. This was the approach she took once again this past weekend on a controversial bill opposed by the entire Asheville City Council.

As constitutional scholars out there will no doubt recall, the Governor of North Carolina has three choices when it comes to most of the bills passed by the legislature: 1) sign them, 2) veto them or 3) do nothing — in which case the bill becomes law as if she had signed it.  (Some bills become law immediately without ever being presented to the Governor).

The reasons for the decision to provide option #3 probably appear in the record of the debate surrounding the amendment that gave the Governor the veto back in the 1990’s and I’m willing to be persuaded that they make some kind of sense. But from the perspective of a simple, common sense test, it’s hard tosee what they possibly are.

Legislators have to vote “yes or “no.” Why does the Governor get to vote “present?”

Also, as a practical matter, what in the heck is preventing Perdue from making a “yea” or “nay” decision? After all, she has only four months left to serve.

The implication of this Asheville Citizen-Times story is that she didn’t like the bill, but figured lawmakers might override her. Well, so what? How about standing up and making your case?

Some have also hypothesized that the Guv didn’t want to take a chance on vetoing the bill because lawmakers might come back to Raleigh to override it and then get into some other additional mischief.

Hmmm. maybe. But they can do that any time they feel like it. Indeed, it seems just as likely, given all the negative publicity they’ve had lately, that legislative leaders might just have been the ones to let the matter go until 2013.

Bottom line: Lawmakers sent the Governor a flawed bill. She knew it and still did nothing about it. All in all, it’s another frustrating, low energy moment from an administration that’s had a lot of them. 

 

 

2 Comments


  1. sundance kidd

    July 30, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    Damn, big government over local government . Who wrote this bill? Oh a Republican.

  2. […] fight or not to fight? Post on August 2, 2012 by Rob Schofield No Comments As noted in this space and others in recent days, Governor Perdue has decided to go out with a whimper when it comes to a […]

Check Also

Cooper continues winning streak against legislators; Judges grant TRO

In case you missed it earlier this evening, ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With just a few hours left until the crossover deadline, the state of North Carolina’s environment i [...]

On Monday morning, there was only one way left to save the Court of Appeals and a few hours with whi [...]

The political compromise that repealed HB2 was enough for the NCAA and ACC, both of which have retur [...]

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

How many times do we have to say it? Well, it’s worth repeating – especially in the aftermath of rec [...]

As the national pundits weigh in on President Trump’s first 100 days in office and the General Assem [...]

How the General Assembly is spending “crossover week” and what it ought to be doing The last week of [...]

To casual observers, the recent controversy surrounding public school class-size mandates in grades [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more