NC Budget and Tax Center, Uncategorized

Keeping Higher Education Affordable

Next month, the UNC Board of Governors (BOG)  will consider changes to the system’s need-based aid policy mandating schools to set aside a minimum of 25 percent of new tuition revenue for need-based financial aid for low-income students. The mandate was established when the Board decided to raise tuition and recognized that the increase would make post-secondary education cost-prohibitive for many low-income students.  Mandating a floor rather than a cap of 25 percent serves to ensure that access to higher education is an inclusive process, recognizes that education plays a key role in helping our least fortunate future citizens reach the American Dream through hard work. Why does the UNC BOG want to make this dream harder and move North Carolina backwards?

Tuition in the UNC system has increased by 58 percent over the course of the Great Recession. For low-income households, tuition costs already represented nearly a third of their budget before these increases took effect.  Parents and students can only work so many jobs and save only so much. Maintaining a longstanding commitment to keeping college accessible to students from low-income families doesn’t require extra effort on the part of the Board of Governors – it’s already in the constitution. This change is a big deal, and it doesn’t have to be this way.

UNC administrators say that tuition increases  have been necessary.  This isn’t surprising since the UNC system’s budget has been cut by 11 percent since the start of the recession.  State funding for need-based aid was cut in the biennial budget too and while this year’s budget restored some of those dollars, total state funding for need-based aid remains well below what is needed for students to attend and complete their education.  And so as the state has divested in post-secondary education and its commitment to an affordable post-secondary education, the university system, families and students have had to come up with new approaches. The UNC BOG would do better to take a different approach to UNC’s financial stresses than to further shift them onto the students and families that can least afford it.

The Board’s action on this issue is critical for the long-term success of the state.  North Carolina needs to increase student completion of degree programs by more than half a million in the coming years in order to meet the forecasted demands of the labor market.  Moreover, post-secondary education has demonstrated its continued ability to offer some protection against economic downturns and boost lifetime earnings.

While the 25% set-aside is no substitute for a recommitment on the part of state policymakers to invest in a post-secondary system that supports students through to completion, it is important to ensuring more students succeed in school and providing some equity for campuses with lower endowments.  If North Carolina wants its less-advantaged young adults to have an equal shot at attending and graduating from college, this set-aside is essential. If North Carolina wants to be able to meet the demands of our labor market in the future, that means making education and training accessible to all North Carolinians. The members of the BOG must decide what is more important next month as they weigh their options: an ideology hidden under the veil of “flexibility” that only serves to support an education for the more advantaged, OR investments that enhance access to the American Dream for all North Carolinians.

3 Comments


  1. Frank Burns

    August 29, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    Increasing tuition or asking the beleagured tax payer for more taxes are both no go’s. They better be looking at cutting costs. I don’t know about anybody else, but how many basket weaving courses, women’s studies, and other nonsense do we need to continue funding and not question cost increases? I think it’s time for a new sherriff. Who says that to be successful we need to fund a 4 year college education to everyone who wants one? There are lower cost alternatives to continuing education, hint community colleges should get the funding with the four year programs be cut.

  2. david esmay

    August 30, 2012 at 9:50 am

    The taxpayers aren’t beleaguered and you’re right, you don’t know about anybody else. As usual the neo-con position is completely backasswards. Look at current unemployment rates, the less education one has, the higher the rate.

  3. […] The Progressive Pulse argues for keeping higher ed in NC affordable. […]

Check Also

Job announcements still fall short of 16,000 new jobs needed every month in N.C. to get back to pre-Recession levels

The North Carolina GOP released a press release ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement refuses to disclose any details of probe into alle [...]

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

Here is something you probably haven’t heard much lately, if at all, given the shocking news from Ch [...]

Lawmakers to return to Raleigh yet again; agenda may include dangerous “de-reg” proposal The North C [...]

The three federal judges could have just come right out and said it: The Republicans who rule the N. [...]

3---number of states that adopted new state Earned Income Tax Credits in 2017---Montana, Hawaii, and [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more