Uncategorized

U.S. Supreme Court says ‘No’ to N.C. Voting Rights Act challenge

In an order issued this morning, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would not hear Kinston, N.C.’s challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

 The Court will nonetheless be considering the merits of Section 5, given its decision on Friday to hear a challenge brought by Shelby County, Alabama.

Section 5 of the VRA requires certain states and jurisdictions to get U.S. Department of Justice preclearance of changes to voting practices.

In Nix, Kinston voters who had approved a 2008 referendum for non-partisan local elections challenged the Justice Department’s refusal to preclear that change, saying that DOJ was using Section 5 in racially divisive ways. Though the Department had initially refused to preclear the change, it ultimately withdrew its objections.

The Court did not comment on why it declined to hear the Nix appeal, but a lower court had already ruled that case to be moot since DOJ had withdrawn its objections.

One Comment


  1. […] second, Ari Berman explains the folly of the Supreme Court’s current flirtation (explained here by Sharon McCloskey earlier this morning) with doing away with section 5 of the Voting Rights Act […]

Check Also

State Supreme Court rules retroactive application of teacher tenure repeal is unconstitutional

The state Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that ...

The Latest Stories from NCPW

Today at 1:00 p.m., the North Carolina Senate Finance Committee will take up the Senate’s latest tax [...]

The post Good ideas threatened by calls for more tax cuts appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

The post Moore, Berger say they have HB2 “agreement in principle” but Cooper denies deal appeared fi [...]

You probably missed the news that the members of the overwhelmingly Republican state Senate finally [...]