Uncategorized

N.C. Blue Cross antitrust class action heading to Alabama

As we’ve reported before, a group of individuals and businesses filed a class action against Blue Cross Blue Shield North Carolina last February, alleging that the company and its counterparts in other states had conspired to divide and allocate health insurance markets across the country in violation of state and federal law.  They also contend that BCBSNC used certain anticompetitive practices — such as “most favored nation” clauses in agreements with providers, which effectively set the floor on pricing — to retain its monopoly here.

By order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,  dated Dec. 12, that action has now been consolidated with some 20 or more similar actions pending across the country and transferred to federal court in Birmingham, Ala.  The court there will handle all pretrial matters, including whether the actions should be certified as class actions.

As the Panel stated:

Here, the actions involve substantial common questions of fact relating to the state BCBS entities’ relationship with the nationalassociation, BCBSA, and the licensing agreements that limit the Blue Plans’ activity to exclusive service areas, among other restrictions. All of the Blue Plans are alleged to be co-conspirators, even though some Blue Plans are named as defendants only in actions in their respective state. Centralizing these actions under Section 1407 will ensure streamlined resolution of this litigation to the overall benefit of the parties and the judiciary.

For all these reasons, on the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization of all actions in the Northern District of Alabama will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. Centralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, including with respect to class certification; 3 and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary.

 

Check Also

State Supreme Court rules retroactive application of teacher tenure repeal is unconstitutional

The state Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The Senate voted along party lines Tuesday night to overturn a partial judicial redistricting bill i [...]

Viola Williams has been crunching numbers and working out possible solutions since last week, when t [...]

With midterm elections around the corner, lawmakers have, unsurprisingly, taken aim at last minute c [...]

On May 25, the news headlines read that Democratic state Senate candidate Jen Mangrum had been disqu [...]

Would that North Carolina lawmakers had been so direct as “Pitchfork Ben” Tillman, a virulent white [...]

“I’m speechless.” So began the heartfelt lament of Rep. Verla Insko (D-Orange) late last Friday afte [...]

The post SB 711 – The pig’s roast appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In another effort to pander to the minority of Americans who want to make abortion and birth control [...]