Uncategorized

Hurricane Sandy relief and the future of coastal policy

Western Carolina University Geology Professor Rob Young posted an excellent essay last week about federal Hurricane Sandy relief legislation and its inclusion of controversial provisions to rebuild the coast “as it was” prior to the storm.

“It may be that we, as a nation, decide that it is worth spending billions of dollars to rebuild this nation’s beaches, but the decision should not be taken quickly, or lightly. Such rebuilding projects will only provide temporary relief from rising sea levels and storms — we will need to spend the money again. And there should be full consideration of the science behind the design of each project and the environmental impacts, which the current bill ignores.

Coastal experts across the country have implored local and federal leaders to take an enlightened approach to replacing infrastructure damaged by Hurricane Sandy and to look for opportunities to change the footprints of communities in an effort to reduce exposure to the next storm. If we are going to invest federal dollars in reducing property at risk in a community, we should be spending the money on long-term solutions, such as relocating roads and buying out the owners of high-risk properties. There are numerous examples of the federal government moving entire towns out of the floodplain after inland floods, including Vallmeyer, Illinois along the Mississippi River. But because it involves high-priced real estate, relocation has never been considered an option for coastal resort communities.

I am not suggesting that the coast should be abandoned. I am suggesting, however, that federal investment in maintaining obviously vulnerable development be reconsidered.”

I haven’t heard whether the problematic provisions are still in the proposal — which the House just passed this afternoon — but whether they are or not, Young’s piece does an excellent job of highlighting the broader issue — namely, that Americans are going to have to adjust their vision of what the nation’s coastline looks like in the decades ahead whether we want to or not.

Read Young’s entire essay by clicking here.

3 Comments


  1. Frank Burns

    January 16, 2013 at 8:42 am

    I agree it is foolish to try and restore the beaches to what they once were. The beach is a fragile environment therefore no federal funds should be spend to restore the beaches. Any construction on the beach should be at the risk of the owner not the public.

  2. david esmay

    January 16, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    Another moronic statement by Frank the right wing tool. 50 percent of the U.S. population lives within 50 miles of the the coast, east and west. Like your republiclown brethren, your statement reflects the short sighted imbeciles that you are.

  3. JeffS

    January 17, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    I have never understood why US citizens always seem ready to underwrite the risk of those who choose to build in volatile areas.

    Don’t get me wrong. I completely understand that influence, tax bases and business profits are why it happens. What I don’t get is why the average person, who will never own oceanfront property doesn’t have a problem with the expenditures.

    As for David, you should be embarrassed to have your name on that comment.

Check Also

GenX disaster: More compelling evidence that incessant GOP budget cuts endanger our well-being

It was already patently obvious, but a story ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

North Carolina lawmakers’ latest attempt to insert politics into the judiciary was thwarted Tuesday [...]

A N.C. General Assembly budget mandate to fire certain North Carolina public education officials wou [...]

More than a month after a deadline to correct faulty campaign finance reports, N.C. Sen. Ralph Hise [...]

Even before he dropped the gavel on the Senate Finance Committee meeting, Sen. Jerry Tillman, a noto [...]

State budget bill is the latest and best example It’s long been a matter of public record that North [...]

By now the strategy is familiar – the strategy used by the N.C. General Assembly’s Republican chiefs [...]

The post The devil and the details appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

18---percentage of people in North Carolina who receive health care coverage from Medicaid or the Ch [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more
 


 
NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more
 


 
Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more