Uncategorized

Hurricane Sandy relief and the future of coastal policy

Western Carolina University Geology Professor Rob Young posted an excellent essay last week about federal Hurricane Sandy relief legislation and its inclusion of controversial provisions to rebuild the coast “as it was” prior to the storm.

“It may be that we, as a nation, decide that it is worth spending billions of dollars to rebuild this nation’s beaches, but the decision should not be taken quickly, or lightly. Such rebuilding projects will only provide temporary relief from rising sea levels and storms — we will need to spend the money again. And there should be full consideration of the science behind the design of each project and the environmental impacts, which the current bill ignores.

Coastal experts across the country have implored local and federal leaders to take an enlightened approach to replacing infrastructure damaged by Hurricane Sandy and to look for opportunities to change the footprints of communities in an effort to reduce exposure to the next storm. If we are going to invest federal dollars in reducing property at risk in a community, we should be spending the money on long-term solutions, such as relocating roads and buying out the owners of high-risk properties. There are numerous examples of the federal government moving entire towns out of the floodplain after inland floods, including Vallmeyer, Illinois along the Mississippi River. But because it involves high-priced real estate, relocation has never been considered an option for coastal resort communities.

I am not suggesting that the coast should be abandoned. I am suggesting, however, that federal investment in maintaining obviously vulnerable development be reconsidered.”

I haven’t heard whether the problematic provisions are still in the proposal — which the House just passed this afternoon — but whether they are or not, Young’s piece does an excellent job of highlighting the broader issue — namely, that Americans are going to have to adjust their vision of what the nation’s coastline looks like in the decades ahead whether we want to or not.

Read Young’s entire essay by clicking here.

3 Comments


  1. Frank Burns

    January 16, 2013 at 8:42 am

    I agree it is foolish to try and restore the beaches to what they once were. The beach is a fragile environment therefore no federal funds should be spend to restore the beaches. Any construction on the beach should be at the risk of the owner not the public.

  2. david esmay

    January 16, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    Another moronic statement by Frank the right wing tool. 50 percent of the U.S. population lives within 50 miles of the the coast, east and west. Like your republiclown brethren, your statement reflects the short sighted imbeciles that you are.

  3. JeffS

    January 17, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    I have never understood why US citizens always seem ready to underwrite the risk of those who choose to build in volatile areas.

    Don’t get me wrong. I completely understand that influence, tax bases and business profits are why it happens. What I don’t get is why the average person, who will never own oceanfront property doesn’t have a problem with the expenditures.

    As for David, you should be embarrassed to have your name on that comment.

Check Also

Senator Tillis needs to stop spinning on immigration crisis and listen to this horrific story

North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis went on Fox ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

More than 10 pollution sources, including two Superfund sites, are within a mile of the new Aberdeen [...]

Report authors, advocates differ over possible side effects On Monday, the Congressional Budget Offi [...]

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Wednesday joined his GOP colleagues on Capitol Hill [...]

All eyes will be on North Carolina next week as partisan gerrymandering takes center stage, once aga [...]

The right-wing wallflowers of The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday, with an almost palpable sense [...]

The post Hofeller: The GOP’s “Michelangelo of the gerrymander” appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

It’s going to happen eventually. It may not be right away and it may not look exactly like it ought [...]

You have to wonder: What would U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. tell that proud North Carolina ge [...]