Uncategorized

The change in DENR’s mission statement

There was a bit of a hubbub recently surrounding the announcement made by the new Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, John Skvarla, that he was altering the Department’s mission statement. Especially in light of Skvarla’s statements in a WRAL interview in which he implied that climate change is an open question, many observers took particular note of language in the new mission statement that refers to “diversity of opinion” on matters of science.

So how much of a change is this? One of the interesting aspects of the whole mission statement story was that no one seems to remember much about what was in the old one.

Yesterday, I called over to DENR and a friendly staffer promptly emailed me the one that had been associated with the Department’s 2009-2013 strategic plan. Click here to look at the brochure that I received.

As you can see, the old “mission statement” was much shorter. It simply stated that DENR’s mission was:

“To conserve and protect North Carolina’s natural resources and to maintain an environment of high quality by providing valuable services that consistently support and benefit the health and well-being of all citizens of our state.”

As you can also see, however, the Strategic Plan brochure does include several other overarching “mission statements” or “goals” as well. Among these is one that says the following:

Climate Change
 GOAL:
 
To address climate change in North Carolina in a comprehensive way, using mitigation efforts and adaptation strategies to increase the resilience of our state’s resources to these complex changes.” 

Though pretty mild, this statement did put DENR on record in a pretty up front way acknowledging the reality of climate change and the need to address it. It would appear, therefore, that unless there’s some other statement I’m missing that reiterates this goal in a public way elsewhere, the new DENR does appear to be backing away from its commitment on this critical issue.

Let’s hope the shift is ultimately one that’s more form than substance.

 

 

 

One Comment


  1. Rip

    January 25, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    Looks good on paper…

Check Also

Must read editorial: Duke should pass along federal tax break to consumers

This morning’s Capitol Broadcasting Company editorial on WRAL.com ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

449,235 - Total undergrad enrollment in North Carolina 19,767 - Total for-profit undergrad enrollmen [...]

There’s a new rumor afoot about judicial reform that lawmakers may try to pass a judicial appointmen [...]

The head of North Carolina’s controversial charter takeover program says there’s no guarantee he’ll [...]

UNC Board of Governors Chairman Louis Bissette began the new year by penning a column urging his own [...]

Mounting student debt is a nagging problem for most families these days. As the cost of higher educa [...]

Latest racist attacks on immigrants could be an important tipping point As bleak as our national pol [...]

Grand constitutional questions in this country aren’t settled until the Supreme Court has its say, e [...]

The post Gerrymander struck down appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more