Uncategorized

The change in DENR’s mission statement

There was a bit of a hubbub recently surrounding the announcement made by the new Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, John Skvarla, that he was altering the Department’s mission statement. Especially in light of Skvarla’s statements in a WRAL interview in which he implied that climate change is an open question, many observers took particular note of language in the new mission statement that refers to “diversity of opinion” on matters of science.

So how much of a change is this? One of the interesting aspects of the whole mission statement story was that no one seems to remember much about what was in the old one.

Yesterday, I called over to DENR and a friendly staffer promptly emailed me the one that had been associated with the Department’s 2009-2013 strategic plan. Click here to look at the brochure that I received.

As you can see, the old “mission statement” was much shorter. It simply stated that DENR’s mission was:

“To conserve and protect North Carolina’s natural resources and to maintain an environment of high quality by providing valuable services that consistently support and benefit the health and well-being of all citizens of our state.”

As you can also see, however, the Strategic Plan brochure does include several other overarching “mission statements” or “goals” as well. Among these is one that says the following:

Climate Change
 GOAL:
 
To address climate change in North Carolina in a comprehensive way, using mitigation efforts and adaptation strategies to increase the resilience of our state’s resources to these complex changes.” 

Though pretty mild, this statement did put DENR on record in a pretty up front way acknowledging the reality of climate change and the need to address it. It would appear, therefore, that unless there’s some other statement I’m missing that reiterates this goal in a public way elsewhere, the new DENR does appear to be backing away from its commitment on this critical issue.

Let’s hope the shift is ultimately one that’s more form than substance.

 

 

 

One Comment


  1. Rip

    January 25, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    Looks good on paper…

Check Also

Advocates: Supreme Court ruling endangers reproductive freedom

Reactions are coming in to today’s U.S. Supreme ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Last semester, as the COVID-19 pandemic closed all UNC System campuses, Samantha Pilot welcomed her [...]

After years of effort, opponents of the cancelled Atlantic Coast Pipeline celebrate, reflect and loo [...]

As COVID-19 cases continue to reach new record highs in North Carolina, students at UNC system schoo [...]

Firebrand conservative academic opts for early retirement in light of latest controversies and provo [...]

For the past month, there has been much said about the current racial climate in America. The eyes o [...]

If ever there was a year in which it is a good thing to be past the midway point, 2020 would appear [...]

The post Bottom Lines Matter appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

…Fellow-citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here to-day? What have I [...]