NC Budget and Tax Center

Parade of Horribles: Sliding Scale Scheme for Unemployment Insurance Duration

Today, county level unemployment rate data was released and tomorrow, policymakers plan to consider the bill to overhaul our state’s unemployment insurance system in a House committee.  In December 2012, we now know that unemployment rates by counties ranged from a high of 16.6 percent in Scotland County to 5.9 percent in Orange County. The state average was 9.5 percent for that month. In light of one aspect of the unemployment insurance bill that kind of variation suggests that unemployed workers will be treated differently by the system based on where they live.

That’s because the bill under consideration includes a provision that establishes a sliding scale for the minimum and maximum duration of weeks that an unemployed worker can receive unemployment insurance benefits based on the state unemployment rate. (We should note that no other state has a sliding scale for the minimum number of weeks while only two states (Florida and Georgia) have a sliding scale for the maximum number of weeks.)

The affect of this provision will be that in counties where the labor market makes it much more difficult to find work, workers who are unemployed will face significantly reduced weeks that are reflective of the state average not local conditions.  In the 2001 recession, forty six counties had unemployment rates higher than the state unemployment rate to a level that should push them into a longer duration.  In the “boom” year of 2006, twenty three counties faced similar conditions.  The result is that their residents who are out of work and receiving unemployment benefits will have fewer weeks than the local labor market conditions merit as policymakers have acknowledged by setting up this very scheme.  In fact, depending on the county’s unemployment rate, the loss in weeks could be as high as eight meaning two full months without a modest, temporary wage replacement.

Another disturbing affect of this provision is that the benefit duration will effectively be cut in half from the current 26 weeks. Even in previous periods of recession, the state unemployment rate did not reach a level that would merit a maximum duration on the new sliding scale scheme of more than 15 weeks.  During most of the time, the duration of weeks will hover at a mere 12 weeks. Maximum Weeks Sliding Scale

One Comment


  1. […] (Florida and Georgia) have a sliding scale for the maximum number of weeks. Read more about the impacts of the proposed sliding […]

Check Also

Coming Trump/Ryan tax proposals promise giveaways to the rich; hard times for North Carolina

As my colleagues have detailed over the past ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

North Carolina’s largest public school system may be warning of “enormous disruptions” without speed [...]

Carol Turner hadn’t lived in North Carolina long before last November’s election. A retired nurse, s [...]

Controversy over class-size requirements in early grades has emerged as the biggest issue facing Nor [...]

How the General Assembly is spending “crossover week” and what it ought to be doing The last week of [...]

To casual observers, the recent controversy surrounding public school class-size mandates in grades [...]

3,000---minimum number of K-3 teachers that school districts will have find to comply with the Gener [...]

The post ‘Backroom politics’ brewing appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more