Uncategorized

Rep. Pittman’s rationale for semi-automatic weapons (video)

One of the speakers at Tuesday’s pro-gun rally at the General Assembly was Rep. Larry Pittman, perhaps best known for sending an email last year calling for the execution of abortion providers.

Pittman explained to the pro-gun crowd that the reason people need semi-automatic assault weapons is not for hunting or personal protection. It is to fight the government. Watch his remarks below.

 

 

6 Comments


  1. Gene Hoglan

    February 5, 2013 at 6:09 pm

    Yes because a crazed redneck with an AR-15 is a match for LRADs and Predator drones. Have fun storming the castle, boys.

  2. jlp75

    February 5, 2013 at 6:33 pm

    Does he not realize that he is now “the government”. One would think he would chose his words a little better.

  3. Frances Jenkins

    February 5, 2013 at 6:41 pm

    I understand crazy now. After I read James’ letter to President Obama, I knew something was not as solid as it should be. No doubt, a little crazy is on both sides.

  4. Brian Irving

    February 5, 2013 at 6:43 pm

    Well, yes. That’s what Americans did in 1775. It’s not a pleasant thought, and I pray it never comes to that, but the reason the Second Amendment was enacted was to guarantee that the people always had the ability to fight an oppressive government.

  5. Gene Hoglan

    February 5, 2013 at 10:44 pm

    Brian: the 2nd amendment was enacted to allow the government to raise militias quickly in order to quell tax and slave revolts. After Shay’s, Whiskey, and Fries’ Rebellions, there was a debate over how to consolidate federal power over outer territories which didn’t get any immediate benefits from taxation. Federalist #29 goes into more detail on the subject.

  6. david esmay

    February 7, 2013 at 8:58 am

    Frances, if you understood crazy, you’d get the professional help you so desperately need.

Check Also

Anthony Scaramucci thought HB2 was “shameful”

Anthony Scaramucci, President Trump’s new communications director, was ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With midterm elections around the corner, lawmakers have, unsurprisingly, taken aim at last minute c [...]

On May 25, the news headlines read that Democratic state Senate candidate Jen Mangrum had been disqu [...]

If it seemed impossible that neighbors of industrialized hog farms had any legal rights left to lose [...]

Can you put a price tag on victims' rights? A fiscal note obtained by NC Policy Watch that has [...]

“I’m speechless.” So began the heartfelt lament of Rep. Verla Insko (D-Orange) late last Friday afte [...]

The post SB 711 – The pig’s roast appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In another effort to pander to the minority of Americans who want to make abortion and birth control [...]

The practice of loading down noncontroversial legislation with divisive and partisan provisions is a [...]