Charlotte Observer: Governor and legislature making things worse

The Charlotte Observer’s editorial board calls decisions by Governor Pat McCrory and the Republican-controlled legislature to reject billions in federal money counterproductive and simply wrong-headed.

Here’s the column that appears in Wednesday’s paper:

‘The legislature’s effort to save the state money is starting to cost the state a boatload of money.observer editorial

The N.C. Senate passed a bill Tuesday that overhauls the state’s system for paying benefits to unemployed workers. That needed tackling, but the way the legislature did it unnecessarily costs the state $780 million from the federal government. Lawmakers could have made all the changes they did and still receive the $780 million by delaying them for just six months.

Gov. Pat McCrory, meanwhile, said Tuesday that he does not want the federal government to pay 100 percent of health insurance costs for 500,000 poor North Carolinians. The House could vote as soon as Wednesday to pass a bill that turns down $2 billion in federal money per year for three years, and billions more in the years after that.

Um, ladies and gentlemen of the House and Senate, could you stop “saving” us so much money?

A wrong-headed fix

If McCrory signs the unemployment bill, as expected, it takes effect July 1. Republican senators defeated an amendment on party lines that would have pushed the effective date to Jan. 1. That triggers a federal law that cuts off federal benefits to 170,000 North Carolinians worth $780 million. That’s money they’d have spent on groceries, the rent or mortgage, and other basic needs. Pulling that much money out of the state’s economy can only hurt consumer spending and job creation.

To be sure, at $2.5 billion, North Carolina has the third-largest debt to the federal government for unemployment benefits. The current system is unsustainable. The problem came about because the state cut taxes on employers and ramped up benefits in the good times. Those changes couldn’t withstand the recession.

The fix, then, should be balanced. But about two-thirds of the savings in this bill come from cutting benefits, the legislature’s fiscal experts say. The unemployed are shouldering the burden by a two-to-one margin.

Perhaps most notable: Once the debt is repaid within three years, employers’ taxes drop back down to today’s levels, but the benefit cuts remain.

All of that makes this solution flawed. And turning down $780 million from outside the state is senseless.

Saving money with Medicaid

McCrory said Tuesday “it would be unfair to the taxpayers” to expand Medicaid when the state’s system is plagued with administrative problems. But the expansion he and the legislature reject would be funded 100 percent by the federal government for three years before phasing down to 90 percent after that.

The state would be better off if McCrory would go about fixing the problems in Medicaid administration while also accepting the many billions to cover low-income residents starting Jan. 1, 2014. Without that federal money, those residents will go to the emergency room or forego care altogether – both of which will cost the state in the short and long run.

The state has serious financial challenges. So far, McCrory and Republicans in the legislature are making them worse.’


  1. Doug

    February 13, 2013 at 10:25 am

    It is just too bad all these newspapers and bloggers cannot see the long con game DC is laying down with their bribery money. It is much better to not be in bed with the Feds when this ponzi scheme blows up and pushes the costs down to the states that were in “partnership” with them. Luckily in NC we will not have expanded a program that we cannot afford in the first place.

  2. Susan Moses

    February 13, 2013 at 11:07 am

    That is simply not true, Doug. Your reasoning is part of the GOP policy of fearmongering. Simply saying something over and over again does not make it true. This is one of the many to add to the pile of Faux News myths. You have to look at who will benefit the most from not accepting the expansion of the program, and it’s certainly not the 500,000 uninsured folks in NC.

  3. JeffS

    February 13, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    Hatred, spite and economic profit are what drive the GOP these days. Concern for the people is not even a passing concern.

    Reducing healthcare, social programs and education today make for a more subservient wage-slave tomorrow.

  4. Doug

    February 13, 2013 at 1:35 pm

    My comment is based on experience. Look up past mandates for the state to take on Medicaid, it is readily available on your search engine if you filter out recent results.

    As far as fear mongering, I believe that is what is being done on both sides if that is what you want to call bringing up issues. I am just more afraid of the results when the state and federal government go broke than I am of if we don’t cover a portion of our people under Medicaid. Reason being, if the government goes broke a LOT more people are going to need the service and it definitely will not be there when the bond markets no longer are willing to fund us. Believe it or not, we are closer to being Greece than you may believe. The only thing holding us up is that we are the reserve currency of the world…for now.

Check Also

Democracy NC: Why North Carolinians should be wary of the legislature’s vague new voter ID proposal

If you missed it over the weekend, be ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With midterm elections around the corner, lawmakers have, unsurprisingly, taken aim at last minute c [...]

On May 25, the news headlines read that Democratic state Senate candidate Jen Mangrum had been disqu [...]

If it seemed impossible that neighbors of industrialized hog farms had any legal rights left to lose [...]

Can you put a price tag on victims' rights? A fiscal note obtained by NC Policy Watch that has [...]

The post SB 711 – The pig’s roast appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In another effort to pander to the minority of Americans who want to make abortion and birth control [...]

The practice of loading down noncontroversial legislation with divisive and partisan provisions is a [...]

It usually happens a few times every legislative session: at some point during their annual stay in [...]