Bill to create new charter school oversight board keeps moving

You might recall that about a month ago, citizens were threatened with arrest as they silently protested SB 337, a bill to create a new charter school board that would remove oversight of public charter schools from the State Board of Education and put it in the hands of a new, independent entity comprising members handpicked by the Governor.

In spite of significant opposition to the bill by members of the public and more debate this morning by lawmakers, SB 337 marched on in a Senate appropriations committee meeting this morning where it was passed without any audible nays.

One of several contentious issues with the bill included the provision that teachers at charter schools would not be required to have gone through a teacher preparation program leading to licensure. The proposed committee substitute before Senate members today made one small change to require that teachers who teach core subject areas in grades six through twelve must be college graduates. However, those teachers would not need to be licensed.

Sen. Tillman justified the no-licensure provision by asserting that there are many people with advanced academic and professional degrees who wish to teach in charter schools, and teacher licensure should not be a barrier for those individuals.

Another adjustment to the bill included language that would require the new charter board to establish rules about criminal background checks for applicants of charter schools, no doubt in response to previous public outrage over the lack of this provision in the original bill. However, Sen. Tillman did acknowledge that the new language was worded in such a way that the charter board could adopt rules that did not, in the end, require charters to conduct criminal background checks.

Currently, charter schools are not required to provide transportation or meals to students, unlike their public school counterparts. Without these provisions, many low-income families would be unable to send their children to charter schools. Despite concerns from some lawmakers about the accessibility of charter schools that do not provide transportation or meals, the latest version of the bill still did not include any language that would require charters to provide these critical resources.

Local school districts would also still be required to lease available buildings or land to a charter school for $1 a year, far below market value, as one lawmaker pointed out.

Senator Ford raised the issue that the funds to be used to create the new charter school board would come from the funding allocation for the current charter school advisory council, which would be abolished upon passage of this bill. This is money that comes out of the State Board of Education’s budget – so they will effectively fund a new advisory board over which they will have little control.

The bill should now move on to the Senate floor.


  1. Christine Chaplik

    May 1, 2013 at 8:20 pm

    Charter schools are just an exchange of taxpayer money to the privvate sector for below par schools, with no availability of services for the high or low end of the spectrum on school achievement. The students also don’t have protections afforded them in the public school system. Charter schools are not better, unless your on the receiving end of taxpayer dollars. Vote no on Charter schools.

  2. Gene Hoglan

    May 2, 2013 at 8:38 am

    Tillman’s an idiot (what else is new). Career professionals with degrees in their content subject who haven’t gotten licensure or taken the Praxis exam can begin teaching through the NC lateral entry program.

    This whole thing, especially the two provisions removing the need for qualification or sex offender background checks, is so the growing number of megachurch homeschools, which are essentially glorified daycares, can get a crack at state education funds.

  3. NC Republican Party – Hypocrisy NC

    May 2, 2013 at 3:34 pm

    […] Sources: Asheville Citizen-Times: Senate OKs Asheville water transfer bill USA Today: N.C. senate tries to force takeover of Charlotte airport WRAL: Wake school board opposes state lawmakers’ push for redistricting NC Policy Watch: Bill to create new charter school oversight board keeps moving […]

Check Also

Changing hats, but my focus remains on education

Dear NC Policy Watch readers, It’s been a ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The UNC Board of Governors is holding its last meeting of 2017 Friday, where the latest of its many [...]

Just south of Candler off the Pisgah Highway is a lovely piece of property on Little Piney Mountain [...]

Veteran North Carolina education policy expert Kris Nordstrom has authored a new and vitally importa [...]

When Joni Robbins, a section chief in the N.C. Department of Public Instruction, closes bidding next [...]

“All speech is free, but some speech is more free than others.” This seems to be the motto of the cu [...]

Trumpists prepare to raze another vital common good law It’s hard to keep up these days with the flo [...]

The post That’s how ‘Humbug’ is done appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

The solid citizens of Johnston County, N.C. – in a fateful quirk of geography – for several years ha [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more

NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more