NC Budget and Tax Center

The Local Costs of Federal Immigration Enforcement

As North Carolina considers legislation that would put in place significant additional enforcement mechanisms of federal immigration laws, it is worth considering what has happened in Colorado.  Colorado introduced legislation in 2006 that requires local law enforcement officers and agencies to report anyone arrested for a criminal offense, who they reasonably believe to be an undocumented immigrant to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).  As part of that legislation, local agencies were required to collect data on implementation.

A report released in December 2012 shows that the costs to local communities have been high.  The state of Colorado spends upwards of $13 million per year to enforce federal immigration laws.  Most interestingly, people with suspected immigration violations stayed in county jail an average of 22 days longer than people without an ICE hold.  Moreover the vast majority were charged with low level offenses.

Legislation heard today in House Finance contains many similar aspects to the Colorado bill and in some instances goes further.  For example, in Colorado, local law enforcement officers and agencies were required to report anyone who they reasonably believe to be an undocumented immigration to ICE after a custodial arrest.  In North Carolina, anyone stopped and detained for any lawful reason, even if it is a minor offense that is not arrestable, can be detained and held in county jail for up to 24 hours so their immigration status can be verified.  Further, the bill makes it harder for undocumented immigrants to post bond, meaning local jails could face increased costs to hold people in jail until trial.

While legislators claim they will be recouping some costs by holding county jail inmates for whom ICE has “guaranteed” reimbursement, this is outside the normal protocol of how ICE and county jails work together.  Reimbursement by ICE for the majority of county jail costs is extremely unlikely.

The North Carolina legislation will impact local governments as well as the state budget. And all North Carolinians will collectively pay for these costs.

Colorado repealed their legislation just last month.  Let’s hope North Carolina doesn’t make the costly mistake of moving this legislation forward.

Check Also

Price tag for tax cuts in final budget tells half the story

The Locke Foundation was having fun with math ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

More than a month after a deadline to correct faulty campaign finance reports, N.C. Sen. Ralph Hise [...]

Even before he dropped the gavel on the Senate Finance Committee meeting, Sen. Jerry Tillman, a noto [...]

The $23 billion budget deal speeding through the N.C. General Assembly this week includes a platoon [...]

Royal Diadem Jewelers in Greensboro sets itself apart in a number of small ways - fast and friendly [...]

The final budget that lawmakers have proposed fails to strengthen the foundation of North Carolina’s [...]

Most of the initial headlines about the final budget agreement announced Monday afternoon by legisla [...]

Unexplained, backroom maneuver would rob already underfunded anti-poverty program There’s no denying [...]

Women and their access to health care has been in the news these past few months, as the plan to rep [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more